第19章

类别:其他 作者:Baron Charles De Secondat Mont字数:9759更新时间:19/01/07 15:06:43
55。\"Ourancestors,\"saysCicero,ProCluentio,\"wouldnotsufferanymanwhomthepartieshadnotagreedto,tobejudgeoftheleastpecuniaryaffair,muchlessofacitizen’sreputation。\" 56。SeeinthefragmentsoftheServilian,Cornelian,andotherlaws,inwhatmannertheselawsappointedjudgesforthecrimestheyproposedtopunish。Theywereoftenpitcheduponbychoice,sometimesbylot,or,infine,bylotmixedtogetherwithchoice。 57。Seneca,DeBenefic。iii。7,infine。 58。SeeQuintilian,iv,p。54,infol。ed。,Paris,1541。 59。Leg。2ff。deorig。jur。Magistrateswhowerecalleddecemvirspresidedincourt,thewholeunderapr?tor’sdirection。 60。QuoniamdecapitecivisRomani,injussupopuliRomani,noneratpermissumconsulibusjusdicere。——SeePomponius,Leg。2,§6,ff。deorig。jur。 61。DionysiusHalicarnassus,v,p。322。 62。Thecomitiabycenturies。ThusManliusCapitolinuswastriedinthesecomitia。——Livy,Dec。1,vi。20。 63。Pomponius,inLeg。2,Dig。,deorig。jur。 64。SeeafragmentofUlpian,whogivesanotheroftheCornelianLaw:itistobemetwithintheCollationoftheMosaicandRomanLaws,tit。i,DeSicariisethomicidiis。 65。Thistookplace,especiallyinregardtocrimescommittedinItaly,whichweresubjectchieflytotheinspectionofthesenate。SeeLivy,Dec。1,ix,26,concerningtheconspiraciesatCapua。 66。ThiswasthecaseintheprosecutionforthemurderofPosthumius,intheyear340ofRome。SeeLivy,iv。50。 67。ThisjudgmentwaspassedintheyearofRome567。 68。Bookviii。 69。Cicero,inBrutus。 70。ThisisprovedfromLivy,bookxliii。46,whosaysthatHannibalrenderedtheirmagistracyannual。 71。Thesenatus—consultumswereinforceforthespaceofayear,thoughnotconfirmedbythepeople。——DionysiusHalicarnassusix,p。595;xi,p。735。 72。Intheyear630。 73。Capitecensosplerosque。——Sallust,DeBelloJugurth,84。 74。Fragmentofthisauthor,xxxvi,inthecollectionofConstantinePorphyrogenitus,OfVirtuesandVices[Historica]。 75。Fragmentofhishistory,takenfromtheextractOfVirtuesandVices[Historica]。 76。FragmentofthebookxxxivintheextractOfVirtuesandVices[Historica]。 77。PenesquosRom?tumjudiciaerant,atqueexequestriordinesolerentsortitojudiceseligiincausaPr?torumetProconsulum,quibuspostadministratamprovinciamdiesdictaerat。 78。Theymadetheiredictsuponenteringtheprovinces。 79。Bookv。19。Seealsoii,iii,iv,andv。 80。AftertheconquestofMacedoniatheRomanspaidnotaxes。 81。SpeechtakenfromTrogusPompeius,andrelatedbyJustin,xxxviii。 4。 82。SeetheorationsagainstVerres。 83。ItiswellknownwhatsortofatribunalwasthatofVarus,whichprovokedtheGermanstorevolt。 BookXII。OftheLawsThatFormPoliticalLiberty,inRelationtotheSubject1。IdeaofthisBook。Itisnotsufficienttohavetreatedofpoliticallibertyinrelationtotheconstitution;wemustexamineitlikewiseintherelationitbearstothesubject。 Wehaveobservedthatintheformercaseitarisesfromacertaindistributionofthethreepowers;butinthelatter,wemustconsideritinanotherlight。Itconsistsinsecurity,orintheopinionpeoplehaveoftheirsecurity。 Theconstitutionmayhappentobefree,andthesubjectnot。Thesubjectmaybefree,andnottheconstitution。Inthosecases,theconstitutionwillbefreebyright,andnotinfact;thesubjectwillbefreeinfact,andnotbyright。 Itisthedispositiononlyofthelaws,andevenofthefundamentallaws,thatconstituteslibertyinrelationtotheconstitution。Butasitregardsthesubject:manners,customs,orreceivedexamplesmaygiverisetoit,andparticularcivillawsmayencourageit,asweshallpresentlyobserve。 Further,asinmoststateslibertyismorecheckedordepressedthantheirconstitutionrequires,itispropertotreatoftheparticularlawsthatineachconstitutionareapttoassistorchecktheprincipleoflibertywhicheachstateiscapableofreceiving。 2。OftheLibertyoftheSubject。Philosophiclibertyconsistsinthefreeexerciseofthewill;oratleast,ifwemustspeakagreeablytoallsystems,inanopinionthatwehavethefreeexerciseofourwill。 Politicallibertyconsistsinsecurity,or,atleast,intheopinionthatweenjoysecurity。 Thissecurityisnevermoredangerouslyattackedthaninpublicorprivateaccusations。Itis,therefore,onthegoodnessofcriminallawsthatthelibertyofthesubjectprincipallydepends。 Criminallawsdidnotreceivetheirfullperfectionallatonce。Eveninplaceswherelibertyhasbeenmostsoughtafter,ithasnotbeenalwaysfound。Aristotle[1]informsusthatatCum?theparentsoftheaccusermightbewitnesses。SoimperfectwasthelawunderthekingsofRomethatServiusTulliuspronouncedsentenceagainstthechildrenofAncusMartius,whowerechargedwithhavingassassinatedtheking,hisfather—in—law。[2]UnderthefirstkingsofFrance,Clotariusmadealaw[3]thatnobodyshouldbecondemnedwithoutbeingheard;whichshowsthatacontrarycustomhadprevailedinsomeparticularcaseoramongsomebarbarouspeople。ItwasCharondasthatfirstestablishedpenaltiesagainstfalsewitnesses。[4]Whenthesubjecthasnofencetosecurehisinnocence,hehasnoneforhisliberty。 Theknowledgealreadyacquiredinsomecountries,orthatmaybehereafterattainedinothers,concerningthesurestrulestobeobservedincriminaljudgments,ismoreinterestingtomankindthananyotherthingintheworld。 Libertycanbefoundedonthepracticeofthisknowledgeonly;andsupposingastatetohavethebestlawsimaginableinthisrespect,apersontriedunderthatstate,andcondemnedtobehangedthenextday,wouldhavemuchmorelibertythanapashaenjoysinTurkey。 3。ThesameSubjectcontinued。Thoselawswhichcondemnamantodeathonthedepositionofasinglewitnessarefataltoliberty。Inreasonthereshouldbetwo,becauseawitnesswhoaffirms,andtheaccusedwhodenies,makeanequalbalance,andathirdmustinclinethescale。 TheGreeks[5]andRomans[6]requiredonevoicemoretocondemn:butourFrenchlawsinsistupontwo。TheGreekspretendthattheircustomwasestablishedbythegods;[7]butthismorejustlymaybesaidofours。 4。ThatLibertyisfavouredbytheNatureandProportionofPunishments。 Libertyisinperfectionwhencriminallawsderiveeachpunishmentfromtheparticularnatureofthecrime。Therearethennoarbitrarydecisions;thepunishmentdoesnotflowfromthecapriciousnessofthelegislator,butfromtheverynatureofthething;andmanusesnoviolencetoman。 Therearefoursortsofcrimes。Thoseofthefirstspeciesareprejudicialtoreligion,thesecondtomorals,thethirdtothepublictranquillity,andthefourthtothesecurityofthesubject。Thepunishmentsinflictedforthesecrimesoughttoproceedfromthenatureofeachofthesespecies。 Intheclassofcrimesthatconcernreligion,Irankonlythosewhichattackitdirectly,suchasallsimplesacrileges。Forastocrimesthatdisturbtheexerciseofit,theyareofthenatureofthosewhichprejudicethetranquillityorsecurityofthesubject,andoughttobereferredtothoseclasses。 Inordertoderivethepunishmentofsimplesacrilegesfromthenatureofthething,[8]itshouldconsistindeprivingpeopleoftheadvantagesconferredbyreligioninexpellingthemoutofthetemples,inatemporaryorperpetualexclusionfromthesocietyofthefaithful,inshunningtheirpresence,inexecrations,comminations,andconjurations。 Inthingsthatprejudicethetranquillityorsecurityofthestate,secretactionsaresubjecttohumanjurisdiction。ButinthosewhichoffendtheDeity,wherethereisnopublicact,therecanbenocriminalmatter,thewholepassesbetweenmanandGod,whoknowsthemeasureandtimeofHisvengeance。Nowifmagistrates,confoundingthings,shouldinquirealsointohiddensacrileges,thisinquisitionwouldbedirectedtoakindofactionthatdoesnotatallrequireit:thelibertyofthesubjectwouldbesubvertedbyarmingthezealoftimorousaswellasofpresumptuousconsciencesagainsthim。 ThemischiefarisesfromanotionwhichsomepeoplehaveentertainedofrevengingthecauseoftheDeity。ButwemusthonourtheDeityandleavehimtoavengehisowncause。And,indeed,werewetobedirectedbysuchanotion,wherewouldbetheendofpunishments?IfhumanlawsaretoavengethecauseofaninfiniteBeing,theywillbedirectedbyhisinfinity,andnotbytheweakness,ignorance,andcapriceofman。 Anhistorian[9]ofProvencerelatesafactwhichfurnishesuswithanexcellentdescriptionoftheconsequencesthatmayariseinweakcapacitiesfromthenotionofavengingtheDeity’scause。AJewwasaccusedofhavingblasphemedagainsttheVirginMary;anduponconvictionwascondemnedtobeflayedalive。Astrangespectaclewasthenexhibited:gentlemenmasked,withknivesintheirhands,mountedthescaffold,anddroveawaytheexecutioner,inordertobetheavengersthemselvesofthehonouroftheblessedVirgin。Idonotherechoosetoanticipatethereflectionsofthereader。 Thesecondclassconsistsofthosecrimeswhichareprejudicialtomorals。Suchistheviolationofpublicorprivatecontinence,thatis,ofthepolicedirectingthemannerinwhichthepleasureannexedtotheconjunctionofthesexesistobeenjoyed。Thepunishmentofthosecrimesoughttobealsoderivedfromthenatureofthething;theprivationofsuchadvantagesassocietyhasattachedtothepurityofmorals,fines,shame,necessityofconcealment,publicinfamy,expulsionfromhomeandsociety,and,infine,allsuchpunishmentsasbelongtoacorrectivejurisdiction,aresufficienttorepressthetemerityofthetwosexes。Ineffectthesethingsarelessfoundedonmalicethanoncarelessnessandself—neglect。 Wespeakhereofnonebutcrimeswhichrelatemerelytomorals,forastothosethatarealsoprejudicialtothepublicsecurity,suchasrapes,theybelongtothefourthspecies。 Thecrimesofthethirdclassarethosewhichdisturbthepublictranquillity。Thepunishmentsoughtthereforetobederivedfromthenatureofthething,andtobeinrelationtothistranquillity;suchasimprisonment,exile,andotherlikechastisementsproperforreclaimingturbulentspirits,andobligingthemtoconformtotheestablishedorder。 Iconfinethosecrimesthatinjurethepublictranquillitytothingswhichimplyabareoffenceagainstthepolice;forastothosewhichbydisturbingthepublicpeaceattackatthesametimethesecurityofthesubject,theyoughttoberankedinthefourthclass。 Thepunishmentsinflicteduponthelattercrimesaresuchasareproperlydistinguishedbythatname。Theyareakindofretaliation,bywhichthesocietyrefusessecuritytoamemberwhohasactuallyorintentionallydeprivedanotherofhissecurity。Thesepunishmentsarederivedfromthenatureofthething,foundedonreason,anddrawnfromtheverysourceofgoodandevil。Amandeservesdeathwhenhehasviolatedthesecurityofthesubjectsofarastodeprive,orattempttodeprive,anothermanofhislife。Thispunishmentofdeathistheremedy,asitwere,ofasicksociety。Whenthereisabreachofsecuritywithregardtoproperty,theremaybesomereasonsforinflictingacapitalpunishment:butitwouldbemuchbetter,andperhapsmorenatural,thatcrimescommittedagainstthesecurityofpropertyshouldbepunishedwiththelossofproperty;andthisought,indeed,tobethecaseifmen’sfortuneswerecommonorequal。Butasthosewhohavenopropertyoftheirownaregenerallythereadiesttoattackthatofothers,ithasbeenfoundnecessary,insteadofapecuniary,tosubstituteacorporal,punishment。 AllthatIhavehereadvancedisfoundedinnature,andextremelyfavourabletothelibertyofthesubject。 5。OfcertainAccusationsthatrequireparticularModerationandPrudence。Itisanimportantmaxim,thatweoughttobeverycircumspectintheprosecutionofwitchcraftandheresy。Theaccusationofthesetwocrimesmaybevastlyinjurioustoliberty,andproductiveofinfiniteoppression,ifthelegislatorknowsnothowtosetboundstoit。Forasitdoesnotdirectlypointataperson’sactions,butathischaracter,itgrowsdangerousinproportiontotheignoranceofthepeople;andthenamanissuretobealwaysindanger,becausethemostexceptionalconduct,thepurestmorals,andtheconstantpracticeofeverydutyinlifearenotasufficientsecurityagainstthesuspicionofhisbeingguiltyofthelikecrimes。 UnderManuelComnenus,theProtestator[10]wasaccusedofhavingconspiredagainsttheemperor,andofhavingemployedforthatpurposesomesecretsthatrendermeninvisible。Itismentionedinthelifeofthisemperor[11]thatAaronwasdetected,ashewasporingoverabookofSolomon’s,thereadingofwhichwassufficienttoconjureupwholelegionsofdevils。Nowbysupposingapowerinwitchcrafttorousetheinfernalspiritstoarms,peoplelookuponamanwhomtheycallasorcererasthepersonintheworldmostlikelytodisturbandsubvertsociety;andofcoursetheyaredisposedtopunishhimwiththeutmostseverity。 Buttheirindignationincreaseswhenwitchcraftissupposedtohavethepowerofsubvertingreligion。ThehistoryofConstantinople[12]informsusthatinconsequenceofarevelationmadetoabishopofamiraclehavingceasedbecauseofthemagicpracticesofacertainperson,boththatpersonandhissonwereputtodeath。Onhowmanysurprisingthingsdidnotthissinglecrimedepend?Thatrevelationsshouldnotbeuncommon,thatthebishopshouldbefavouredwithone,thatitwasreal,thattherehadbeenamiracleinthecase,thatthismiraclehadceased,thattherewasamagicart,thatmagiccouldsubvertreligion,thatthisparticularpersonwasamagician,and,infine,thathehadcommittedthatmagicact。 TheEmperorTheodorusLascarisattributedhisillnesstowitchcraft。 Thosewhowereaccusedofthiscrimehadnootherresourceleftthantohandleared—hotironwithoutbeinghurt。ThusamongtheGreeksapersonoughttohavebeenasorcerertobeabletoclearhimselfoftheimputationofwitchcraft。Suchwastheexcessoftheirstupiditythattothemostdubiouscrimeintheworldtheyjoinedthemostdubiousproofsofinnocence。 UnderthereignofPhiliptheLong,theJewswereexpelledfromFrance,beingaccusedofhavingpoisonedthespringswiththeirlepers。Soabsurdanaccusationoughttomakeusdoubtallthosethatarefoundedonpublichatred。 Ihavenothereassertedthatheresyoughtnottobepunished;Isaidonlythatweoughttobeextremelycircumspectinpunishingit。 6。OftheCrimeagainstNature。GodforbidthatIshouldhavetheleastinclinationtodiminishthepublichorroragainstacrimewhichreligion,morality,andcivilgovernmentequallycondemn。Itoughttobeproscribed,wereitonlyforitscommunicatingtoonesextheweaknessesoftheother,andforleadingpeoplebyascandalousprostitutionoftheiryouthtoanignominiousoldage。WhatIshallsayconcerningitwillinnowaydiminishitsinfamy,beinglevelledonlyagainstthetyrannythatmayabusetheveryhorrorweoughttohaveagainstthevice。 Asanaturalcircumstanceofthiscrimeissecrecy,therearefrequentinstancesofitshavingbeenpunishedbylegislatorsuponthedepositionofachild。Thiswasopeningaverywidedoortocalumny。\"Justinian,\" saysProcopius,[13]\"publishedalawagainstthiscrime;heorderedaninquirytobemadenotonlyagainstthosewhowereguiltyofit,aftertheenactingofthatlaw,butevenbefore。Thedepositionofasinglewitness,sometimesofachild,sometimesofaslave,wassufficient,especiallyagainstsuchaswererich,andagainstthoseofthegreenfaction。\" Itisveryoddthatthesethreecrimes,witchcraft,heresy,andthatagainstnature,ofwhichthefirstmighteasilybeprovednottoexist; thesecondtobesusceptibleofaninfinitenumberofdistinctions,interpretations,andlimitations;thethirdtobeoftenobscureanduncertain——itisveryodd,Isay,thatthesethreecrimesshouldamongstusbepunishedwithfire。 Imayventuretoaffirmthatthecrimeagainstnaturewillnevermakeanygreatprogressinsociety,unlesspeoplearepromptedtoitbysomeparticularcustom,asamongtheGreeks,wheretheyouthsofthatcountryperformedalltheirexercisesnaked;asamongstus,wheredomesticeducationisdisused;asamongsttheAsiatics,whereparticularpersonshaveagreatnumberofwomenwhomtheydespise,whileotherscanhavenoneatall。Lettherebenocustomspreparatorytothiscrime;letit,likeeveryotherviolationofmorals,beseverelyproscribedbythecivilmagistrate;andnaturewillsoondefendorresumeherrights。 Nature,thatfond,thatindulgentparent,hasstrewnherpleasureswithabounteoushand,andwhileshefillsuswithdelights,shepreparesus,bymeansofourissue,inwhomweseeourselves,asitwere,reproduced——shepreparesus,Isay,forfuturesatisfactionsofamoreexquisitekindthanthoseverydelights。 7。OftheCrimeofHighTreason。ItisdeterminedbythelawsofChinathatwhosoevershowsanydisrespecttotheemperoristobepunishedwithdeath。Astheydonotmentioninwhatthisdisrespectconsists,everythingmayfurnishapretexttotakeawayaman’slife,andtoexterminateanyfamilywhatsoever。 Twopersonsofthatcountrywhowereemployedtowritethecourtgazette,havinginsertedsomecircumstancesrelatingtoacertainfactthatwasnottrue,itwaspretendedthattotellalieinthecourtgazettewasadisrespectshowntothecourt,inconsequenceofwhichtheywereputtodeath。[14]Aprinceofthebloodhavinginadvertentlymadesomemarkonamemorialsignedwiththeredpencilbytheemperor,itwasdeterminedthathehadbehaveddisrespectfullytothesovereign; whichoccasionedoneofthemostterriblepersecutionsagainstthatfamilythateverwasrecordedinhistory。[15] Ifthecrimeofhightreasonbeindeterminate,thisaloneissufficienttomakethegovernmentdegenerateintoarbitrarypower。IshalldescantmorelargelyonthissubjectwhenIcometotreat[16]ofthecompositionoflaws。 8。OftheMisapplicationoftheTermsSacrilegeandHighTreason。Itislikewiseashockingabusetogivetheappellationofhightreasontoanactionthatdoesnotdeserveit。Byanimperiallaw[17]itwasdecreedthatthosewhocalledinquestiontheprince’sjudgment,ordoubtedthemeritofsuchashehadchosenforapublicoffice,shouldbeprosecutedasguiltyofsacrilege。[18]Surelyitwasthecabinetcouncilandtheprince’sfavouriteswhoinventedthatcrime。Byanotherlaw,itwasdeterminedthatwhosoevermadeanyattempttoinjuretheministersandofficersbelongingtothesovereignshouldbedeemedguiltyofhightreason,asifhehadattemptedtoinjurethesovereignhimself。[19] Thislawisowingtotwoprinces[20]remarkablefortheirweakness—— princeswhowereledbytheirministersasflocksbyshepherds;princeswhowereslavesinthepalace,childreninthecouncil,strangerstothearmy;princes,infine,whopreservedtheirauthorityonlybygivingitawayeveryday。Someofthosefavouritesconspiredagainsttheirsovereigns。Nay,theydidmore,theyconspiredagainsttheempire—— theycalledinbarbarousnations;andwhentheemperorswantedtostoptheirprogressthestatewassoenfeebledastobeunderanecessityofinfringingthelaw,andofexposingitselftothecrimeofhightreasoninordertopunishthosefavourites。 AndyetthisistheverylawwhichthejudgeofMonsieurdeCinq—Marsbuiltupon[21]whenendeavouringtoprovethatthelatterwasguiltyofthecrimeofhightreasonforattemptingtoremoveCardinalRichelieufromtheministry。Hesays:\"Crimesthataimatthepersonsofministersaredeemedbytheimperialconstitutionsofequalconsequencewiththosewhicharelevelledagainsttheemperor’sownperson。Aministerdischargeshisdutytohisprinceandtohiscountry:toattempt,therefore,toremovehim,isendeavouringtodeprivetheformeroneofhisarms,[22]andthelatterofpartofitspower。\"Itisimpossibleforthemeanesttoolsofpowertoexpressthemselvesinmoreservilelanguage。 ByanotherlawofValentinian,Theodosius,andArcadius,[23]falsecoinersaredeclaredguiltyofhightreason。Butisnotthisconfoundingtheideasofthings?Isnottheveryhorrorofhightreasondiminishedbygivingthatnametoanothercrime? 9。ThesameSubjectcontinued。PaulinushavingwrittentotheEmperorAlexanderthat\"hewaspreparingtoprosecuteforhightreasonajudgewhohaddecidedcontrarytohisedict,\"theemperoranswered,\"thatunderhisreigntherewasnosuchthingasindirecthightreason。\"[24] Faustinianwrotetothesameemperorthatashehadswornbytheprince’slifenevertopardonhisslave,hefoundhimselftherebyobligedtoperpetuatehiswrath,lestheshouldincurtheguiltofl?samajestas。Uponwhichtheemperormadeanswer,\"Yourfearsaregroundless,[25]andyouareastrangertomyprinciples。\" Itwasdeterminedbyasenatus—consultum[26]thatwhosoevermelteddownanyoftheemperor’sstatueswhichhappenedtoberejectedshouldnotbedeemedguiltyofhightreason。TheEmperorsSeverusandAntoninuswrotetoPontius[27]thatthosewhosoldunconsecratedstatuesoftheemperorshouldnotbechargedwithhightreason。ThesameprinceswrotetoJuliusCassianusthatifapersoninflingingastoneshouldbychancestrikeoneoftheemperor’sstatuesheshouldnotbeliabletoaprosecutionforhightreason。[28]TheJulianlawrequiresthissortoflimitations;forinvirtueofthislawthecrimeofhightreasonwaschargednotonlyuponthosewhomelteddowntheemperor’sstatues,butlikewiseonthosewhocommittedanysuchlikeaction,[29]whichmadeitanarbitrarycrime。Whenanumberofcrimesofl?samajestashadbeenestablished,theywereobligedtodistinguishtheseveralsorts。HenceUlpian,thecivilian,aftersayingthattheaccusationofl?samajestasdidnotdiewiththecriminal,addsthatthisdoesnotrelatetoallthetreasonableactsestablishedbytheJulianlaw,[30]butonlytothatwhichimpliesanattemptagainsttheempire,oragainsttheemperor’slife。 10。ThesameSubjectcontinued。TherewasalawpassedinEnglandunderHenryVIII,bywhichwhoeverpredictedtheking’sdeathwasdeclaredguiltyofhightreason。Thislawwasextremelyvague;theterrorofdespoticpowerissogreatthatitrecoilsuponthosewhoexerciseit。