foralltithes。ThusLordAbingdonreceived,tostartwith,about750acres。
Theresiduewastobeallottedamongthevariousparishes,townshipsand
hamlets,eachallotmenttobeheldasacommonpastureforthetownship。
Sofar,beyondthefactthatLordAbingdonhadtakenoffmorethanasixth
partoftheircommonpasture,andthatthepasturewasnowdividedupinto
differentparts,itdidnotseemthattheordinaryinhabitantsweremuch
affected。Thestinglayinthearrangementsforthefutureofthesedivided
commonpastures。’Andifatanyfuturetimethemajorpartinvalueofthe
severalpersonsinterestedinsuchplotorparcelsofland,shouldrequire
aseparatedivisionofthesaidland,he(thecommissioner)isdirectedto
divideandallotthesameamongtheseveralproprietors,inproportionto
theirindividualrightsandintereststherein。’(27*)
Wehave,fortunately,averyclearstatementofthewayinwhichthe’rights
andinterests’ofthepoorerinhabitantsoftheOtmoortownswereregarded
intheenclosure。Theseinhabitants,itmustberemembered,hadenjoyedrights
ofcommonwithoutanystintfromtimeimmemorial,simplybyvirtueofliving
inthedistrict。Inaletterfrom’AnOtmoorProprietor’totheOxfordpapers
in1830,thewriter(SirAlexanderCrokehimself?),whowasevidentlyaman
ofsomelocalimportance,explainsthatbythegeneralruleoflawacommoner
isnotentitledtoturnontothecommonmorecattlethanaresufficient
tomanureandstockthelandtowhichtherightofcommonisannexed。Accordingly,
houseswithoutlandattachedtothemcannot,strictlyspeaking,claimaright
ofcommon。HowthenexplainthestateofaffairsatOtmoor,whereallthe
inhabitants,landedorlandless,enjoyedthesamerights?Byprescription,
heanswers,merehousesdoinpointoffactsometimesacquirearightof
common,butthisright,thoughitmaybesaidtobewithoutstint,isin
realityalwaysliabletobestintedbylaw。Hence,whenacommonlikeOtmoor
isenclosed,theallotmentsaremadeaselsewhereinproportiontotheamount
oflandpossessedbyeachcommoner,whista’proportionableshare’isthrown
intothosewhoownmerehouses。Buteventhisshare,hepointsout,does
notnecessarilybelongtothepersonwhohasbeenexercisingtherightof
common,unlesshehappenstoownhisownhouse。Itbelongstohislandlord,
whoaloneisentitledtocompensation。Asuperficialobservermightperhaps
thinkthisahardship,butinpointoffactitisquitejust。Thetenants,
occupyingthehouses,musthavebeenpayingahigherrentinconsideration
oftherightattachedtothehouses,andtheyhavealwaysbeenliableto
beturnedoutbythelandlordatwill。’Theyhadnopermanentinterest,and
ithasbeendecidedbythelawthatnomancanhaveanyrightinanycommon,
asbelongingtoahouse,whereinhehasnointerestbutonlyhabitation:
sothatthepoor,assuch,hadnorighttothecommonwhatever。’(28*)
TheresultsoftheAct,framedandadministeredontheselines,weredescribed
byDunkin,(29*)writingin1823,asfollows:’Itnowonlyremainstonotice
theeffectoftheoperationofthisact。Onthedivisionofthelandallotted
totherespectivetownships,acertainportionwasassignedtoeachcottager
inlieuofhisaccustomedcommonage,butthedeliveryoftheallotmentdid
nottakeplace,unlessthepartytowhomitwasassignedpaidhisshareof
theexpensesincurredindraininganddividingthewaste:andhewasalso
furtherdirectedtoenclosethesamewithafence。Thepovertyofthecottager
ingeneralpreventedhiscompliancewiththeseconditions,andhewasnecessitated
tosellhisshareforanypaltrysumthatwasoffered。Inthespringof1819,
severalpersonsatCharltonandelsewheremadeprofitablespeculationsby
purchasingthesecommonsfor£;5each,andafterwardsprevailingonthe
commissionerstothrowthemintoonelot;thusformingavaluableestate。
InthiswaywasOtmoorlosttothepoorman,andawardedtotherich,under
thespeciousideaofbenefittingthepublic。’TheexpensesoftheAct,it
maybementioned,cametosomethingbetween£;20,000and£;30,000,
ormorethanthefee-simpleofthesoil。(30*)
’EnclosedOtmoordidnotfulfilArthurYoung’shopes:……insteadofthe
expectedimprovementinthequalityofthesoil,ithasbeenrenderedalmost
totallyworthless;agreatproportionbeingatthismomentover-ratedat
5s。anacreyearlyrent,fewcropsyieldinganymorethanbarelysufficient
topayforlabourandseed。’(31*)Thisexcessofexpensesoverprofitswas
adducedbythe’Otmoorproprietor,’towhomwehavealreadyreferred,as
anfrustrationofthepublic-spiritedself-sacrificeoftheenclosers,who
werepayingoutoftheirownpocketsforanationalbenefit,andbymaking
some,atanyrate,ofthelandcapableofcultivation,wereenablingthe
poortohave’anhonestemployment,insteadoflosingtheirtimeinidleness
andwaste。’(32*)Butfifteenyearsofthis’honestemployment’failedto
reconcilethepoortotheirnewposition,andin1830theywereabletoexpress
theirfeelingsinastrikingmanner。(33*)
Inthecourseofhisdrainageoperations,thecommissionerhadmadea
newchannelfortheriverRay,atahigherlevel,withthedisastrousresult
thattheRayoverflowedintoavaluabletractoflowlandaboveOtmoor。For
twoyearsthefarmersofthistractsufferedseverelosses(onefarmerwas
saidtohavelost£;400inthattime),thentheytookthelawintotheir
ownhands,andinJune1829cuttheembankments,sothatthewatersofthe
RayagainflowedoverOtmoorandlefttheirvaluablelandunharmed。Twenty-two
farmerswereindictedforfelonyforthisact,buttheywereacquittedat
theAssizes,underthedirectionofMr。JusticeParke,onthegroundsthat
thefarmershadarighttoabatethenuisance,andthatthecommissioner
hadexceededhispowersinmakingthisnewchannelandembankment。
ThisjudgmentproducedaprofoundimpressionontheOtmoorfarmersand
cottagers。TheymisreadittomeanthatallproceedingsundertheEnclosure
Actwereillegalandthereforenullandvoid,andtheydeterminedtoregain
theirlostprivileges。DisturbancesbeganattheendofAugust(28thAugust)。
Foraboutaweek,stragglingpartiesofenthusiastsparadedthemoor,cutting
downfenceshereandthere。AsonofSirAlexanderCrokecameouttoone
ofthesepartiesandorderedthemtodesist。Hehadaloadedpistolwith
him,andthemoor-men,thinking,rightlyorwrongly,thathewasgoingto
fire,wresteditfromhimandgavehimaseverethrashing。Mattersbegan
tolookserious:localsympathywiththerioterswassostrongthatspecial
constablesrefusedtobeswornin;theHighSheriffaccordinglysummoned
theOxfordshireMilitia,andLordChurchill’stroopofYeomanryCavalrywas
senttoIslip。Buttheinhabitantswerenotoverawed。Theydeterminedto
perambulatetheboundsofOtmoorinfullforce,inaccordancewiththeold
custom。OnMonday,6thSeptember,fivehundredmen,womenandchildrenassembled
fromtheOtmoortowns,andtheywerejoinedbyfivehundredmorefromelsewhere。
Armedwithreap-hook,hatchets,bill-hooksandduckets,theymarchedinorder
roundtheseven-mile-longboundaryofOtmoor,destroyingallthefenceson
theirway。Bynoontheirworkofdestructionwasfinished。’Afarmerinthe
neighbourhoodwhowitnessedthescenegivesaludicrousdescriptionofthe
zealandperseveranceofthewomenandchildrenaswellasthemen,andthe
easeandcomposurewithwhichtheywadedthroughdepthsofmudandwater
andovercameeveryobstacleintheirmarch。Headdsthathedidnothear
anythreateningexpressionsagainstanypersonorhisproperty,andhedoes
notbelieveanyindividualspresententertainedanyfeelingorwishbeyond
theassertionofwhattheyconceived(whethercorrectlyorerroneously)to
betheirprescriptiveandinalienableright,andofwhichtheyspeakprecisely
asthefreemenofOxfordwoulddescribetheirrighttoPortMeadow。’(34*)
Bythetimethedestructionoffenceswascomplete,LordChurchill’stroop
ofyeomanrycameuptothedestroyingband:theRiotActwasread,butthe
moormenrefusedtodisperse。Sixtyorseventyofthemwerethereuponseized
andexamined,withtheresultthatforty-fourweresentofftoOxfordGaol
inwagons,underanescortofyeomanry。Nowithappenedtobethedayof
St。Giles’Fair,andthestreetofSt。Giles,alongwhichtheyeomanrybrought
theirprisoners,wascrowdedwithcountryfolkandtownsfolk,mostofwhom
heldstrongviewsontheOtmoorquestion。Themeninthewagonsraisedthe
cry’Otmoorforever,’thecrowdtookitup,andattackedtheyeomenwith
greatviolence,hurlingbrickbats,stonesandstickatthemfromeveryside。
TheyeomenmanagedtogettheirprisonersasfarastheturningdownBeaumont
Street,buttheretheywereoverpowered,andallforty-fourprisonersescaped。
AtOtmooritselfpeacenowreigned。Throughthebrokenfencescattlewere
turnedintograzeonalltheenclosures,andthevillagersevenappointed
aherdsmantolookafterthem。TheinhabitantsofthesevenOtmoortowns
formedanassociationcalled’theOtmoorAssociation,’whichboldlydeclared
that’theRightofCommononOtmoorwasalwaysintheinhabitants,andthat
anon-residentproprietorhadnoRightofCommonthereon,’anddetermined
toraisesubscriptionsforlegalexpensesindefenceoftheirright,calling
upon’thepecuniaryaidofaliberalandbenevolentpublic……toassistthem
inattemptingtorestoreOtmooroncemoretoitsoriginalstate。’(35*)
Meanwhiletheauthoritieswhohadlosttheirprisonersonce,sentdown
astrongerforcetotakethemnexttime,andalthoughattheOxfordCity
SessionsabillofindictmentagainstWilliamPriceandothersforriotin
St。Gilesandrescueoftheprisonerswasthrownout,attheCountySessions
theGrandJuryfoundatrueBillagainstthesameWilliamPriceandothers
forthesameoffence,andalsoagainstCooperandothersforriotatOtmoor。
TheprisonersweretriedattheOxfordAssizesnextmonth,beforeMr。Justice
BosanquetandSirJohnPatteson。Thejuryreturnedaverdictwhichshows
thestrengthofpublicopinion。’Wefindthedefendantsguiltyofhaving
beenpresentatanunlawfulassemblyonthe6thSeptemberatOtmoor,but
itistheunanimouswishoftheJurytorecommendallthepartiestothe
mercifulconsiderationoftheCourt。’Thejudgesrespondedtothisappeal
andthelongestsentenceinflictedwasformonths’imprisonment。(36*)
Theoriginalenclosurewasnowfifteenyearsold,butOtmoorwasstill
inrebellion,andtheHomeOfficePapersofthenexttwoyearscontainfrequent
applicationsfortroopsfromLordMacclesfield,Lord-Lieutenant,SirAlexander
Crokeandothermagistrates。Whenevertherewasafullmoon,thepatriots
ofthemoorturnedoutandpulleddownthefences。Howstrongwasthelocal
resentmentoftheoverridingofalltherightsandtraditionsofthecommoners
maybeseennotonlyfromthelanguageofonemagistratewritingtoLord
MelbourneinJanuary1832:’allthetownsintheneighborhoodofOtmoorare
moreorlessinfectedwiththefeelingsofthemostviolent,andcannotat
allbedependedon:’butalsofromaresolutionpassedbythemagistrates
atOxfordinFebruaryofthatyear,declaringthatnoconstabularyforce
thatthemagistratescouldraisewouldbeequaltosuppressingtheOtmoor
outrages,andaskingforsoldiers。Theappealendedwiththissignificant
warning:’AnyforcewhichGovernmentmaysenddownshouldnotremainfor
alengthoftimetogether,butthattoavoidthepossibilityofanundue
connexionbetweenthepeopleandtheMilitary,asuccessionoftroopsshould
beobserved。’Solongandsobitterwasthecivilwarrousedbyanenclosure
whichParliamenthadsanctionedinabsolutedisregardoftheopinionsor
thetraditionsorthecircumstancesofthemassofthepeopleitaffected。
MostprivateEnclosureActsprovidedthatifacommissionerdiedhis
successorwastobesomebodynotinterestedintheproperty。
SirJohnSinclaircomplainedin1796,thattheBoardhadnoteventhe
privilegeoffrankingitsletters——AnnalsofAgriculture,vol。
FromtheSelectCommitteeontheMeansofFacilitatingEnclosuresin
1800,reprintedinAnnualRegister,1800,AppendixtoChronicle,p。
85ff。,welearnthatthefeesreceivedaloneintheHouseofCommons(Bill
fees,smallfees,committeefees,housekeepers’andmessengers’fees,and
engrossingfees)for707Billsduringthefourteenyearsfrom1786to1799
inclusiveamountedtonolessthat£;59,867,6s。4d。Asthescaleof
feesintheHouseofLordswasaboutthesame(Billfees,yeoman,usher,
door-keepers’fees,orderofcommittee,andcommitteefees)duringthese
yearsabout£;120,000musthavegoneintothepocketsofParliamentary
officials。
BedfordReport,p。249。Cf。writerinAppendixofReport
onMiddlesex,pp。507-15,’agentlemanoftheleastsensibilitywould
rathersufferhisresidencetocontinuesurroundedbymarshesandbogs,than
taketheleadinwhatmaybedeemedanobnoxiousmeasure。’Thissamewriter
urges,thattheunpopularityofenclosureswouldbeovercomewerecaretaken
’toplacetheinferiorordersofmankind——thecottagerandindustrious
poor——insuchasituation,withregardtoinclosures,thattheyshould
certainlyhavesomesharesecuredtothem,andhetreatedwithagentlehand。
Keepallintemper——letnorightsbenowdisputed……Itisfarmoreeasy
topreventaclamourthantostopitwhenonceitisraised。Thosewhoare
acquaintedwiththebusinessofinclosuremustknowthattherearemorethan
four-fifthsoftheinhabitantsinmostneighbourhoodswhoaregenerallyleft
outofthebillforwantforproperty,andthereforecannotpossiblyclaim
anypartthereof。’
’Allowtothecottageralittlelandabouthisdwellingforkeeping
acow,forplantingpotatoes,forraisingflaxorhemp。2ndly。Convertthe
wastelandsofthekingdomintosmallarablefarms,acertainquantityevery
year,tobeletonfavourbletermstoindustriousfamilies。3rdly,Restrain
theengrossmentandover-enlargementoffarms。Theproprietyofthosemeasures
cannot,Ithink,hequestioned。’——TheCaseofLabourersinHusbandry,
p。103。
AnnalsofAgriculture,vol。i,p。52。
ThisschememarksagreatadvanceonanearlierschemewhichYoung
publishedinthefirstvolumeoftheAnnalsofAgriculture。Hethen
proposedthatpublicmoneyshouldbespentinsettlingcottagersorsoldiers
onthewaste,givingthemtheirholdingfreeofrentandtithesforthree
lives,attheendofwhichtimethelandtheyhadredeemedwastorevert
toitsoriginalowners。
ThePoorMan’sBestFriend,orLandtocultivateforhisownBenefit。
LettertotheMarquisofSalisbury,bytheRev。S。Demainbary,B。D。,1831。