第10章

类别:其他 作者:Friedrich Engels, Clemens Palm字数:31408更新时间:18/12/21 16:54:14
Inmediaevalsociety,especiallyintheearliercenturies,productionwasessentiallydirectedtowardssatisfyingthewantsoftheindividual。 Itsatisfied,inthemain,onlythewantsoftheproducerandhisfamily。 Whererelationsofpersonaldependenceexisted,asinthecountry,italsohelpedtosatisfythewantsofthefeudallord。Inallthistherewas,therefore,noexchange;theproducts,consequently,didnotassumethecharacterofcommodities。Thefamilyofthepeasantproducedalmosteverythingtheywanted:clothesandfurniture,aswellasmeansofsubsistence。Onlywhenitbegantoproducemorethanwassufficienttosupplyitsownwantsandthepaymentsinkindtothefeudallord,onlythendiditalsoproducecommodities。Thissurplus,thrownintosocialisedexchangeandofferedforsale,becamecommodities。Theartisansofthetowns,itistrue,hadfromthefirsttoproduceforexchange。Butthey,also,themselvessuppliedthegreatestpartoftheirownindividualwants。Theyhadgardensandplotsofland。Theyturnedtheircattleoutintothecommunalforest,whichalso,yieldedthemtimberandfiring。Thewomenspunflax,wool,andsoforth。 Productionforthepurposeofexchange,productionofcommodities,wasonlyinitsinfancy。Hence,exchangewasrestricted,themarketnarrow,themethodsofproductionstable;therewaslocalexclusivenesswithout,localunitywithin,themark[114]inthecountry; inthetown,theguild。 Butwiththeextensionoftheproductionofcommodities,andespeciallywiththeintroductionofthecapitalistmodeofproduction,thelawsofcommodityproduction,hithertolatent,cameintoactionmoreopenlyandwithgreaterforce。Theoldbondswereloosened,theoldexclusivelimitsbrokenthrough,theproducersweremoreandmoreturnedintoindependent,isolatedproducersofcommodities。Theanarchyofsocialproductionbecameapparentandgrewtogreaterandgreaterheight。Butthechiefmeansbyaidofwhichthecapitalistmodeofproductionintensifiedthisanarchyofsocialisedproductionwastheexactoppositeofanarchy。Itwastheincreasingorganisationofproduction,uponasocialbasis,ineveryindividualproductiveestablishment。Bythis,theold,peaceful,stableconditionofthingswasended。Whereverthisorganisationofproductionwasintroducedintoabranchofindustry,itbrookednoothermethodofproductionbyitsside。Whereitlaidholdofahandicraft,thatoldhandicraftwaswipedout。Thefieldoflabourbecameabattle-ground。Thegreatgeographicaldiscoveries,andthecolonisationfollowinguponthem,multipliedmarketsandquickenedthetransformationofhandicraftintomanufacture。Thewardidnotsimplybreakoutbetweentheindividualproducersofparticularlocalities。Thelocalstrugglesbegotintheirturnnationalconflicts,thecommercialwarsoftheseventeenthandtheeighteenthcenturies。[115]Finally,modernindustryandtheopeningoftheworldmarketmadethestruggleuniversal,andatthesametimegaveitanunheard-ofvirulence。Advantagesinnaturalorartificialconditionsofproductionnowdecidetheexistenceornon-existenceofindividualcapitalists,aswellasofwholeindustriesandcountries。Hethatfallsisremorselesslycastaside。ItistheDarwinianstruggleoftheindividualforexistencetransferredfromnaturetosocietywithintensifiedviolence。Theconditionsofexistencenaturaltotheanimalappearasthefinaltermofhumandevelopment。Thecontradictionbetweensocialisedproductionandcapitalisticappropriationnowpresentsitselfasanantagonismbetweentheorganisationofproductionintheindividualworkshop,andtheanarchyofproductioninsocietygenerally。 Thecapitalisticmodeofproductionmovesinthesetwoformsoftheantagonismimmanenttoitfromitsveryorigin。Itisneverabletogetoutofthat“viciouscircle“whichFourierhadalreadydiscovered。 WhatFouriercouldnot,indeed,seeinhistimeisthatthiscircleisgraduallynarrowing;thatthemovementbecomesmoreandmoreaspiral,andmustcometoanend,likethemovementoftheplanets,bycollisionwiththecentre。Itisthecompellingforceofanarchyintheproductionofsocietyatlargethatmoreandmorecompletelyturnsthegreatmajorityofmenintoproletarians;anditisthemassesoftheproletariatagainwhowillfinallyputanendtoanarchyinproduction。Itisthecompellingforceofanarchyinsocialproductionthatturnsthelimitlessperfectibilityofmachineryundermodernindustryintoacompulsorylawbywhicheveryindividualindustrialcapitalistmustperfecthismachinerymoreandmore,underpenaltyofruin。Buttheperfectingofmachineryismakinghumanlaboursuperfluous。Iftheintroductionandincreaseofmachinerymeansthedisplacementofmillionsofmanualbyafewmachine-workers,improvementinmachinerymeansthedisplacementofmoreandmoreofthemachine-workersthemselves。Itmeans,inthelastinstance,theproductionofanumberofavailablewage-workersinexcessoftheaverageneedsofcapital,theformationofacompleteindustrialreservearmy,asIcalleditin1845,*9availableatthetimeswhenindustryisworkingathighpressure,tobecastoutuponthestreetwhentheinevitablecrashcomes,aconstantdead-weightuponthelimbsoftheworkingclassinitsstruggleforexistencewithcapital,aregulatorforthekeepingofwagesdowntothelowlevelthatsuitstheinterestsofcapital。Thusitcomesabout,toquoteMarx,thatmachinerybecomesthemostpowerfulweaponinthewarofcapitalagainsttheworkingclass;thattheinstrumentsoflabourconstantlytearthemeansofsubsistenceoutofthehandsofthelabourer; thattheveryproductoftheworkeristurnedintoaninstrumentforhissubjugation。Thusitcomesaboutthattheeconomisingoftheinstrumentsoflabourbecomesatthesametime,fromtheoutset,themostrecklesswasteoflabour-power,androbberybaseduponthenormalconditionsunderwhichlabourfunctions;thatmachinery,themostpowerfulinstrumentforshorteninglabour-time,becomesthemostunfailingmeansforplacingeverymomentofthelabourer’stimeandthatofhisfamilyatthedisposalofthecapitalistforthepurposeofexpandingthevalueofhiscapital。Thusitcomesaboutthattheoverworkofsomebecomesthepreliminaryconditionfortheidlenessofothers,andthatmodernindustry,whichhuntsafternewconsumersoverthewholeworld,forcestheconsumptionofthemassesathomedowntoastarvationminimum,andindoingthisdestroysitsownhomemarket。“Thelawthatalwaysequilibratestherelativesurplus-population,orindustrialreservearmy,totheextentandenergyofaccumulation,thislawrivetsthelabourertocapitalmorefirmlythanthewedgesofVulcandidPrometheustotherock。Itestablishesanaccumulationofmiserycorrespondingwithaccumulationofcapital。Accumulationofwealthatonepoleis,therefore,atthesametimeaccumulationofmisery,agonyoftoil,slavery,ignorance,brutality,mentaldegradation,attheoppositepole,i。e。,onthesideoftheclassthatproducesitsownproductintheformofcapital“(Marx’sCapital,p。671。)Andtoexpectanyotherdivisionoftheproductsfromthecapitalisticmodeofproductionisthesameasexpectingtheelectrodesofabatterynottodecomposeacidulatedwater,nottoliberateoxygenatthepositive,hydrogenatthenegativepole,solongastheyareconnectedwiththebattery。 Wehaveseenthattheeverincreasingperfectibilityofmodernmachineryis,bytheanarchyofsocialproduction,turnedintoacompulsorylawthatforcestheindividualindustrialcapitalistalwaystoimprovehismachinery,alwaystoincreaseitsproductiveforce。Thebarepossibilityofextendingthefieldofproductionistransformedforhimintoasimilarcompulsorylaw。Theenormousexpansiveforceofmodernindustry,comparedwithwhichthatofgasesismerechild’splay,appearstousnowasanecessityforexpansion,bothqualitativeandquantitative,thatlaughsatallresistance。 Suchresistanceisofferedbyconsumption,bysales,bythemarketsfortheproductsofmodernindustry。Butthecapacityforextension,extensiveandintensive,ofthemarketsisprimarilygovernedbyquitedifferentlawsthatworkmuchlessenergetically。Theextensionofthemarketscannotkeeppacewiththeextensionofproduction。Thecollisionbecomesinevitable,andasthiscannotproduceanyrealsolutionsolongasitdoesnotbreakinpiecesthecapitalistmodeofproduction,thecollisionsbecomeperiodic。 Capitalistproductionhasbegottenanother“viciouscircle“。 Asamatteroffact,since1825,whenthefirstgeneralcrisisbrokeout,thewholeindustrialandcommercialworld,productionandexchangeamongallcivilisedpeoplesandtheirmoreorlessbarbarichangers-on,arethrownoutofjointaboutonceeverytenyears。Commerceisatastandstill,themarketsareglutted,productsaccumulate,asmultitudinousastheyareunsaleable,hardcashdisappears,creditvanishes,factoriesareclosed,themassoftheworkersareinwantofthemeansofsubsistence,becausetheyhaveproducedtoomuchofthemeansofsubsistence;bankruptcyfollowsuponbankruptcy,executionuponexecution。Thestagnationlastsforyears; productiveforcesandproductsarewastedanddestroyedwholesale,untiltheaccumulatedmassofcommoditiesfinallyfiltersoff,moreorlessdepreciatedinvalue,untilproductionandexchangegraduallybegintomoveagain。 Littlebylittlethepacequickens。Itbecomesatrot。Theindustrialtrotbreaksintoacanter,thecanterinturngrowsintotheheadlonggallopofaperfectsteeplechaseofindustry,commercialcredit,andspeculation,whichfinally,afterbreak-neckleaps,endswhereitbegan——intheditchofacrisis。Andsooverandoveragain。Wehavenow,sincetheyear1825,gonethroughthisfivetimes,andatthepresentmoment(1877)wearegoingthroughitforthesixthtime。AndthecharacterofthesecrisesissoclearlydefinedthatFourierhitallofthemoffwhenhedescribedthefirstascriseplethorique,acrisisfromplethora。 Inthesecrises,thecontradictionbetweensocialisedproductionandcapitalistappropriationendsinaviolentexplosion。Thecirculationofcommoditiesis,forthetimebeing,stopped。Money,themeansofcirculation,becomesahindrancetocirculation。Allthelawsofproductionandcirculationofcommoditiesareturnedupsidedown。Theeconomiccollisionhasreacheditsapogee。Themodeofproductionisinrebellionagainstthemodeofexchange,theproductiveforcesareinrebellionagainstthemodeofproductionwhichtheyhaveoutgrown。 Thefactthatthesocialisedorganisationofproductionwithinthefactoryhasdevelopedsofarthatithasbecomeincompatiblewiththeanarchyofproductioninsociety,whichexistssidebysidewithanddominatesit,isbroughthometothecapitaliststhemselvesbytheviolentconcentrationofcapitalthatoccursduringcrises,throughtheruinofmanylarge,andastillgreaternumberofsmall,capitalists。Thewholemechanismofthecapitalistmodeofproductionbreaksdownunderthepressureoftheproductiveforces,itsowncreations。Itisnolongerabletoturnallthismassofmeansofproductionintocapital。Theyliefallow,andforthatveryreasontheindustrialreservearmymustalsoliefallow。Meansofproduction,meansofsubsistence,availablelabourers,alltheelementsofproductionandofgeneralwealth,arepresentinabundance。But“abundancebecomesthesourceofdistressandwant“(Fourier),becauseitistheverythingthatpreventsthetransformationofthemeansofproductionandsubsistenceintocapital。Forincapitalisticsocietythemeansofproductioncanonlyfunctionwhentheyhaveundergoneapreliminarytransformationintocapital,intothemeansofexploitinghumanlabour-power。Thenecessityofthistransformationintocapitalofthemeansofproductionandsubsistencestandslikeaghostbetweentheseandtheworkers。Italonepreventsthecomingtogetherofthematerialandpersonalleversofproduction;italoneforbidsthemeansofproductiontofunction,theworkerstoworkandlive。 Ontheonehand,therefore,thecapitalisticmodeofproductionstandsconvictedofitsownincapacitytofurtherdirecttheseproductiveforces。 Ontheother,theseproductiveforcesthemselves,withincreasingenergy,pressforwardtotheremovaloftheexistingcontradiction,totheabolitionoftheirqualityascapital,tothepracticalrecognitionoftheircharacterassocialproductiveforces。 Thisrebellionoftheproductiveforces,astheygrowmoreandmorepowerful,againsttheirqualityascapital,thisstrongerandstrongercommandthattheirsocialcharactershallberecognised,forcesthecapitalistclassitselftotreatthemmoreandmoreassocialproductiveforces,sofarasthisispossibleundercapitalistconditions。Theperiodofindustrialhighpressure,withitsunboundedinflationofcredit,notlessthanthecrashitself,bythecollapseofgreatcapitalistestablishments,tendstobringaboutthatformofthesocialisationofgreatmassesofmeansofproductionwhichwemeetwithinthedifferentkindsofjoint-stockcompanies。Manyofthesemeansofproductionandofcommunicationare,fromtheoutset,socolossalthat,liketherailways,theyexcludeallotherformsofcapitalisticexploitation。Atafurtherstageofevolutionthisformalsobecomesinsufficient:theofficialrepresentativeofcapitalistsociety——thestate——willultimatelyhaveto*10undertakethedirectionofproduction。Thisnecessityforconversionintostatepropertyisfeltfirstinthegreatinstitutionsforintercourseandcommunication——thepostoffice,thetelegraphs,therailways。 Ifthecrisesdemonstratetheincapacityofthebourgeoisieformanaginganylongermodernproductiveforces,thetransformationofthegreatestablishmentsforproductionanddistributionintojoint-stockcompaniesandstatepropertyshowshowunnecessarythebourgeoisieareforthatpurpose。 Allthesocialfunctionsofthecapitalistarenowperformedbysalariedemployees。Thecapitalisthasnofurthersocialfunctionthanthatofpocketingdividends,tearingoffcoupons,andgamblingontheStockExchange,wherethedifferentcapitalistsdespoiloneanotheroftheircapital。Atfirstthecapitalistmodeofproductionforcesouttheworkers。Nowitforcesoutthecapitalists,andreducesthem,justasitreducedtheworkers,totheranksofthesurpluspopulation,althoughnotimmediatelyintothoseoftheindustrialreservearmy。 Butthetransformation,eitherintojoint-stockcompanies,orintostateownership,doesnotdoawaywiththecapitalisticnatureoftheproductiveforces。Inthejoint-stockcompaniesthisisobvious。Andthemodernstate,again,isonlytheorganisationthatbourgeoissocietytakesoninordertosupportthegeneralexternalconditionsofthecapitalistmodeofproductionagainsttheencroachmentsaswelloftheworkersasofindividualcapitalists。Themodernstate,nomatterwhatitsform,isessentiallyacapitalistmachine,thestateofthecapitalists,theidealpersonificationofthetotalnationalcapital。Themoreitproceedstothetakingoverofproductiveforces,themoredoesitactuallybecomethenationalcapitalist,themorecitizensdoesitexploit。Theworkersremainwage-workers——proletarians。Thecapitalistrelationisnotdoneawaywith。Itisratherbroughttoahead。But,broughttoahead,ittopplesover。Stateownershipoftheproductiveforcesisnotthesolutionoftheconflict,butconcealedwithinitarethetechnicalconditionsthatformtheelementsofthatsolution。 Thissolutioncanonlyconsistinthepracticalrecognitionofthesocialnatureofthemodernforcesofproduction,andthereforeintheharmonisingofthemodesofproduction,appropriation,andexchangewiththesocialisedcharacterofthemeansofproductionAndthiscanonlycomeaboutbysocietyopenlyanddirectlytakingpossessionoftheproductiveforceswhichhaveoutgrownallcontrolexceptthatofsocietyasawhole。 Thesocialcharacterofthemeansofproductionandoftheproductstodayreactsagainsttheproducers,periodicallydisruptsallproductionandexchange,actsonlylikealawofnatureworkingblindly,forcibly,destructively。 Butwiththetakingoverbysocietyoftheproductiveforces,thesocialcharacterofthemeansofproductionandoftheproductswillbeutilisedbytheproducerswithaperfectunderstandingofitsnature,andinsteadofbeingasourceofdisturbanceandperiodicalcollapse,willbecomethemostpowerfulleverofproductionitself。 Activesocialforcesworkexactlylikenaturalforces:blindly,forcibly,destructively,solongaswedonotunderstand,andreckonwith,them。Butwhenonceweunderstandthem,whenoncewegrasptheiraction,theirdirection,theireffects,itdependsonlyuponourselvestosubjectthemmoreandmoretoourownwill,andbymeansofthemtoreachourownends。Andthisholdsquiteespeciallyofthemightyproductiveforcesoftoday。Aslongasweobstinatelyrefusetounderstandthenatureandthecharacterofthesesocialmeansofaction——andthisunderstandinggoesagainstthegrainofthecapitalistmodeofproductionanditsdefenders——solongtheseforcesareatworkinspiteofus,inoppositiontous,solongtheymasterus,aswehaveshownaboveindetail。Butwhenoncetheirnatureisunderstood,theycan,inthehandsoftheproducersworkingtogether,betransformedfrommasterdemonsintowillingservants。Thedifferenceisasthatbetweenthedestructiveforceofelectricityinthelightningofthestorm,andelectricityundercommandinthetelegraphandthevoltaicarc;thedifferencebetweenaconflagration,andfireworkingintheserviceofman。Withthisrecognition,atlast,oftherealnatureoftheproductiveforcesoftoday,thesocialanarchyofproductiongivesplacetoasocialregulationofproductionuponadefiniteplan,accordingtotheneedsofthecommunityandofeachindividual。Thenthecapitalistmodeofappropriation,inwhichtheproductenslavesfirsttheproducerandthentheappropriator,isreplacedbythemodeofappropriationoftheproductsthatisbaseduponthenatureofthemodernmeansofproduction: upontheonehand,directsocialappropriation,asmeanstothemaintenanceandextensionofproduction——ontheother,directindividualappropriation,asmeansofsubsistenceandofenjoyment。 Whilstthecapitalistmodeofproductionmoreandmorecompletelytransformsthegreatmajorityofthepopulationintoproletarians,itcreatesthepowerwhich,underpenaltyofitsowndestruction,isforcedtoaccomplishthisrevolution。Whilstitforcesonmoreandmorethetransformationofthevastmeansofproduction,alreadysocialised,intostateproperty,itshowsitselfthewaytoaccomplishingthisrevolution。Theproletariatseizespoliticalpowerandturnsthemeansofproductioninthefirstinstanceintostateproperty。But,indoingthis,itabolishesitselfasproletariat,abolishesallclassdistinctionsandclassantagonisms,abolishesalsothestateasstate。Societythusfar,baseduponclassantagonisms,hadneedofthestate,thatis,ofanorganisationoftheparticularclass,whichwasprotemporetheexploitingclass,forthemaintenanceofitsexternalconditionsofproduction,and,therefore,especially,forthepurposeofforciblykeepingtheexploitedclassesintheconditionofoppressioncorrespondingwiththegivenmodeofproduction(slavery,serfdom,wage-labour)。Thestatewastheofficialrepresentativeofsocietyasawhole;thegatheringofittogetherintoavisibleembodiment。Butitwasthisonlyinsofarasitwasthestateofthatclasswhichitselfrepresented,forthetimebeing,societyasawhole:inancienttimes,thestateofslave-owningcitizens;intheMiddleAges,thefeudallords; inourowntime,thebourgeoisie。Whenatlastitbecomestherealrepresentativeofthewholeofsociety,itrendersitselfunnecessary。Assoonasthereisnolongeranysocialclasstobeheldinsubjection;assoonasclassrule,andtheindividualstruggleforexistencebaseduponourpresentanarchyinproduction,withthecollisionsandexcessesarisingfromthese,areremoved,nothingmoreremainstoberepressed,andaspecialrepressiveforce,astate,isnolongernecessary。Thefirstactbyvirtueofwhichthestatereallyconstitutesitselftherepresentativeofthewholeofsociety——thetakingpossessionofthemeansofproductioninthenameofsociety——thisis,atthesametime,itslastindependentactasastate。Stateinterferenceinsocialrelationsbecomes,inonedomainafteranother,superfluous,andthendiesoutofitself;thegovernmentofpersonsisreplacedbytheadministrationofthings,andbytheconductofprocessesofproduction。Thestateisnot“abolished“。Itdiesout。Thisgivesthemeasureofthevalueofthephrase“afreepeople’sstate“,bothastoitsjustifiableuseattimesbyagitators,andastoitsultimatescientificinsufficiency[117];andalsoofthedemandsoftheso-calledanarchistsfortheabolitionofthestateoutofhand。 Sincethehistoricalappearanceofthecapitalistmodeofproduction,theappropriationbysocietyofallthemeansofproductionhasoftenbeendreamedof,moreorlessvaguely,byindividuals,aswellasbysects,astheidealofthefuture。Butitcouldbecomepossible,couldbecomeahistoricalnecessity,onlywhentheactualconditionsforitsrealisationwerethere。Likeeveryothersocialadvance,itbecomespracticable,notbymenunderstandingthattheexistenceofclassesisincontradictiontojustice,equality,etc。,notbythemerewillingnesstoabolishtheseclasses,butbyvirtueofcertainneweconomicconditions。Theseparationofsocietyintoanexploitingandanexploitedclass,arulingandanoppressedclass,wasthenecessaryconsequenceofthedeficientandrestricteddevelopmentofproductioninformertimes。Solongasthetotalsociallabouronlyyieldsaproducewhichbutslightlyexceedsthatbarelynecessaryfortheexistenceofall;solong,therefore,aslabourengagesalloralmostallthetimeofthegreatmajorityofthemembersofsociety——solong,ofnecessity,thissocietyisdividedintoclasses。Sidebysidewiththegreatmajority,exclusivelybondslavestolabour,arisesaclassfreedfromdirectlyproductivelabour,whichlooksafterthegeneralaffairsofsociety:thedirectionoflabour,statebusiness,law,science,art,etc。Itis,therefore,thelawofdivisionoflabourthatliesatthebasisofthedivisionintoclasses。Butthisdoesnotpreventthisdivisionintoclassesfrombeingcarriedoutbymeansofviolenceandrobbery,trickeryandfraud。Itdoesnotpreventtherulingclass,oncehavingtheupperhand,fromconsolidatingitspowerattheexpenseoftheworkingclass,fromturningitssocialleadershipintoanexploitationofthemasses。 Butif,uponthisshowing,divisionintoclasseshasacertainhistoricaljustification,ithasthisonlyforagivenperiod,onlyundergivensocialconditions。Itwasbasedupontheinsufficiencyofproduction。 Itwillbesweptawaybythecompletedevelopmentofmodernproductiveforces。And,infact,theabolitionofclassesinsocietypresupposesadegreeofhistoricalevolutionatwhichtheexistence,notsimplyofthisorthatparticularrulingclass,butofanyrulingclassatall,and,therefore,theexistenceofclassdistinctionitselfhasbecomeanobsoleteanachronism。 Itpresupposes,therefore,thedevelopmentofproductioncarriedouttoadegreeatwhichappropriationofthemeansofproductionandoftheproducts,and,withthis,ofpoliticaldomination,ofthemonopolyofculture,andofintellectualleadershipbyaparticularclassofsociety,hasbecomenotonlysuperfluousbuteconomically,politically,intellectuallyahindrancetodevelopment。Thispointisnowreached。Theirpoliticalandintellectualbankruptcyisscarcelyanylongerasecrettothebourgeoisiethemselves。 Theireconomicbankruptcyrecursregularlyeverytenyears。Ineverycrisis,societyissuffocatedbeneaththeweightofitsownproductiveforcesandproducts,whichitcannotuse,andstandshelplessfacetofacewiththeabsurdcontradictionthattheproducershavenothingtoconsume,becauseconsumersarewanting。Theexpansiveforceofthemeansofproductionburststhebondsthatthecapitalistmodeofproductionhadimposeduponthem。 Theirdeliverancefromthesebondsistheonepreconditionforanunbroken,constantlyaccelerateddevelopmentoftheproductiveforces,andtherewithforapracticallyunlimitedincreaseofproductionitself。Noristhisall。Thesocialisedappropriationofthemeansofproductiondoesaway,notonlywiththepresentartificialrestrictionsuponproduction,butalsowiththepositivewasteanddevastationofproductiveforcesandproductsthatareatthepresenttimetheinevitableconcomitantsofproduction,andthatreachtheirheightinthecrises。Further,itsetsfreeforthecommunityatlargeamassofmeansofproductionandofproducts,bydoingawaywiththesenselessextravaganceoftherulingclassesoftodayandtheirpoliticalrepresentatives。Thepossibilityofsecuringforeverymemberofsociety,bymeansofsocialisedproduction,anexistencenotonlyfullysufficientmaterially,andbecomingdaybydaymorefull,butanexistenceguaranteeingtoallthefreedevelopmentandexerciseoftheirphysicalandmentalfaculties——thispossibilityisnowforthefirsttimehere,butitishere。*11 Withtheseizingofthemeansofproductionbysocietyproductionofcommoditiesisdoneawaywith,and,simultaneously,themasteryoftheproductovertheproducer。Anarchyinsocialproductionisreplacedbysystematic,definiteorganisation。Thestruggleforindividualexistencedisappears。Thenforthefirsttimeman,inacertainsense,isfinallymarkedofffromtherestoftheanimalkingdom,andemergesfrommereanimalconditionsofexistenceintoreallyhumanones。Thewholesphereoftheconditionsoflifewhichenvironman,andwhichhavehithertoruledman,nowcomesunderthedominionandcontrolofmanwhoforthefirsttimebecomesthereal,consciouslordofnaturebecausehehasnowbecomemasterofhisownsocialorganisation。Thelawsofhisownsocialaction,hithertostandingfacetofacewithmanaslawsofnatureforeignto,anddominatinghim,willthenbeusedwithfullunderstanding,andsomasteredbyhim。 Man’sownsocialorganisation,hithertoconfrontinghimasanecessityimposedbynatureandhistory,nowbecomestheresultofhisownfreeaction。 Theextraneousobjectiveforcesthathavehithertogovernedhistorypassunderthecontrolofmanhimself。Onlyfromthattimewillmanhimself,withfullconsciousness,makehisownhistory——onlyfromthattimewillthesocialcausessetinmovementbyhimhave,inthemainandinaconstantlygrowingmeasure,theresultsintendedbyhim。Itisthehumanity’sleapfromthekingdomofnecessitytothekingdomoffreedom。 Toaccomplishthisactofuniversalemancipationisthehistoricalmissionofthemodernproletariat。Tothoroughlycomprehendthehistoricalconditionsandthustheverynatureofthisact,toimparttothenowoppressedclassafullknowledgeoftheconditionsandofthemeaningofthemomentousactitiscalledupontoaccomplish,thisisthetaskofthetheoreticalexpressionoftheproletarianmovement,scientificsocialism。 III。 PRODUCTIONAfterallthathasbeensaidabove,thereaderwillnotbesurprisedtolearnthattheexpositionoftheprincipalfeaturesofsocialismgivenintheprecedingpartisnotatallinaccordancewithHerrDühring’sview。Onthecontrary。Hemusthurlitintotheabysswhereliealltheotherrejected“bastardsofhistoricalandlogicalfantasy“,“barrenconceptions“,“confusedandhazynotions“{D。K。G。498},etc。 ToHerrDühring,socialisminfactisnotatallanecessaryproductofhistoricaldevelopmentandstilllessofthegrosslymaterialeconomicconditionsoftoday,directedtowardthefillingofthestomachexclusively{231}。He’sgotitallworkedoutmuchbetter。Hissocialismisafinalandultimatetruth; itis“thenaturalsystemofsociety“{D。Ph。282},whoserootsaretobefoundina“universalprincipleofjustice“{D。C。282},andifhecannotavoidtakingnoticeoftheexistingsituation,createdbythesinfulhistoryofthepast,inordertoremedyit,thismustberegardedratherasamisfortuneforthepureprincipleofjustice。HerrDühringcreateshissocialism,likeeverythingelse,throughthemediumofhisfamoustwomen。Insteadofthesetwopuppetsplayingthepartofmasterandservant,astheydidinthepast,theyperformthisonce,forachange,thepieceontheequalityofrights——andthefoundationsoftheDühringiansocialismhavebeenlaid。 ItthereforegoeswithoutsayingthattoHerrDühringtheperiodicalcrisesinindustryhavenotatallthehistoricalsignificancewhichwewerecompelledtoattributetothem。 Inhisview,crisesareonlyoccasionaldeviationsfrom“normality“ {218}andatmostonlyservetopromote“thedevelopmentofamoreregulatedorder“{219}。The“commonmethod“{227}ofexplainingcrisesbyover-productionisinnowiseadequateforhis“moreexactconceptionofthings“{343}。 Ofcoursesuchanexplanation“maybepermissibleforspecificcrisesinparticularareas“。As,forexample,“aswampingofthebookmarketwithworkssuddenlyreleasedforrepublicationandsuitableformasssale“{227}。 HerrDühringcanatanyrategotosleepwiththegratifyingfeelingthathisimmortalworkswillneverbringonanysuchworlddisaster。 Heclaims,however,thatingreatcrises,itisnotover-production,butrather“thelaggingbehindofpopularconsumption……artificiallyproducedunder-consumption……interferencewiththenaturalgrowthoftheneedsofthepeople“(!)“whichultimatelymakethegulfbetweensupplyanddemandsocriticallywide“{D。C。227,228}。 Andhehasevenhadthegoodfortunetofindadiscipleforthiscrisistheoryofhis。 Butunfortunatelytheunder-consumptionofthemasses,therestrictionoftheconsumptionofthemassestowhatisnecessaryfortheirmaintenanceandreproduction,isnotanewphenomenon。Ithasexistedaslongastherehavebeenexploitingandexploitedclasses。Eveninthoseperiodsofhistorywhenthesituationofthemasseswasparticularlyfavourable,asforexampleinEnglandinthefifteenthcentury,theyunder-consumed。Theywereveryfarfromhavingtheirownannualtotalproductattheirdisposaltobeconsumedbythem。Therefore,whileunder-consumptionhasbeenaconstantfeatureinhistoryforthousandsofyears,thegeneralshrinkageofthemarketwhichbreaksoutincrisesastheresultofasurplusofproductionisaphenomenononlyofthelastfiftyyears;andsoHerrDühring’swholesuperficialvulgareconomicsisnecessaryinordertoexplainthenewcollisionnotbythenewphenomenonofover-productionbutbythethousand-year-oldphenomenonofunder-consumption。Itislikeamathematicianattemptingtoexplainthevariationintheratiobetweentwoquantities,oneconstantandonevariable,notbythevariationofthevariablebutbythefactthattheconstantquantityremainsunchanged。Theunder-consumptionofthemassesisanecessaryconditionofallformsofsocietybasedonexploitation,consequentlyalsoofthecapitalistform;butitisthecapitalistformofproductionwhichfirstgivesrisetocrises。Theunder-consumptionofthemassesisthereforealsoaprerequisiteconditionofcrises,andplaysinthemarolewhichhaslongbeenrecognised。Butittellsusjustaslittlewhycrisesexisttodayaswhytheydidnotexistbefore。 HerrDühring’snotionsoftheworldmarketarealtogethercurious。Wehaveseenhow,likeatypicalGermanmanofletters,heseekstoexplainrealindustrialspecificcrisesbymeansofimaginarycrisesontheLeipzigbookmarket——thestormontheoceanbythestorminateacup。Healsoimaginesthatpresent-daycapitalistproductionmust“dependforitsmarketmainlyonthecirclesofthepossessingclassesthemselves“{221},whichdoesnotpreventhim,onlysixteenpageslater,frompresenting,inthegenerallyacceptedway,theironandcottonindustriesasthemodernindustriesofdecisiveimportance{236}——thatis,preciselythetwobranchesofproductionwhoseoutputisconsumedonlytoaninfinitesimallysmalldegreewithinthecircleofthepossessingclassesandisdependentmorethananyotheronmassuse。WhereverweturninHerrDühring’sworksthereisnothingbutemptyandcontradictorychatter。Butletustakeanexamplefromthecottonindustry。IntherelativelysmalltownofOldhamalone——itisoneofadozentownsroundManchesterwithfiftytoahundredthousandinhabitantsengagedinthecottonindustry——inthistownalone,inthefouryears1872to1875,thenumberofspindlesspinningonlyNumber32yarnincreasedfromtwoandahalftofivemillion;sothatinonemedium-sizedEnglishtownthereareasmanyspindlesspinningonesinglecountasthecottonindustryofallGermany,includingAlsace,possesses。AndtheexpansionintheotherbranchesandareasofthecottonindustryinEnglandandScotlandhastakenplaceinapproximatelythesameproportion。Inviewofthesefacts,itrequiresastrongdoseofdeep-rooted{555-56}effronterytoexplainthepresentcompletestagnationintheyarnandclothmarketsbytheunder-consumptionoftheEnglishmassesandnotbytheover-productioncarriedonbytheEnglishcotton-millowners。*12 Butenough。OnedoesnotarguewithpeoplewhoaresoignorantofeconomicsastoconsidertheLeipzigbookmarketinthemodernindustrialsense。LetusthereforemerelynotethatHerrDühringhasonlyonemorepieceofinformationforusonthesubjectofcrises,thatincriseswehavenothing“buttheordinaryinterplayofoverstrainandrelaxation“{228};thatover-speculation“isnotonlyduetotheplanlessmultiplicationofprivateenterprises“,butthat“therashnessofindividualentrepreneursandthelackofprivatecircumspectionmustalsobereckonedamongthecauseswhichgiverisetooversupply“{229}。 Andwhat,again,isthe“causewhichgivesrise“totherashnessandlackofprivatecircumspection?Justpreciselythisveryplanlessnessofcapitalistproduction,whichmanifestsitselfintheplanlessmultiplicationofprivateenterprises。Andtomistakethetranslationofaneconomicfactintomoralreprobationasthediscoveryofanewcauseisalsoapieceofextreme“rashness“。 Withthiswecanleavethequestionofcrises。Intheprecedingsectionweshowedthattheywerenecessarilyengenderedbythecapitalistmodeofproduction,andexplainedtheirsignificanceascrisesofthismodeofproductionitself,asmeansofcompellingthesocialrevolution,anditisnotnecessarytosayanotherwordinreplytoHerrDühring’ssuperficialitiesonthissubject。Letuspassontohispositivecreations,the“naturalsystemofsociety“{D。Ph。282}。 Thissystem,builtona“universalprincipleofjustice“{D。C。 320}andthereforefreefromallconsiderationoftroublesomematerialfacts,consistsofafederationofeconomiccommunesamongwhichthereis“freedomofmovementandobligatoryacceptanceofnewmembersonthebasisoffixedlawsandadministrativeregulations“{323}。 Theeconomiccommuneitselfisaboveall“acomprehensiveschematismofgreatimportinhumanhistory“{341} whichisfarsuperiortothe“erroneoushalf-measures“,forexample,ofacertainMarx{342}。Itimplies“acommunityofpersonslinkedtogetherbytheirpublicrighttodisposeofadefiniteareaoflandandagroupofproductiveestablishmentsforuseincommon,jointlyparticipatingintheproceeds“{322}。Thispublicrightisa“righttotheobject……inthesenseofapurelypublicisticrelationtonatureandtotheproductiveinstitutions“{342}。 Weleaveittothefuturejuristsoftheeconomiccommunetocudgeltheirbrainsastowhatthismeans;wegiveitup。Theonlythingwegatheristhatitisnotatallthesameasthe“corporativeownershipofworkers’ associations“{342}whichwouldnotexcludemutualcompetitionandeventheexploitationofwage-labour。 Inthisconnectionhedropstheremarkthattheconceptionofa“collectiveownership“,suchasisfoundalsoinMarx,is“tosaytheleastunclearandopentoquestion,asthisconceptionofthefuturealwaysgivestheimpressionthatitmeansnothingmorethancorporativeownershipbygroupsofworkers“{295}。 ThisisonemoreinstanceofHerrDühring’susual“vilehabits“ofpassingoffathingforwhatitisnot,“forwhosevulgarnature“——tousehisownwords——“onlythevulgarwordsnottywouldbequiteappropriate“ {D。K。G。506};itisjustasbaselessalieasHerrDühring’sotherinventionthatbycollectiveownershipMarxmeansan“ownershipwhichisatoncebothindividualandsocial“{503,505}。 Inanycasethismuchseemsclear:thepublicisticrightofaneconomiccommuneinitsmeansoflabour,isanexclusiverightofpropertyatleastasagainsteveryothereconomiccommuneandalsoasagainstsocietyandthestate。 Butthisrightisnottoentitlethecommune“tocutitselfoff…… fromtheoutsideworld,foramongthevariouseconomiccommunesthereisfreedomofmovementandobligatoryacceptanceofnewmembersonthebasisoffixedlawsandadministrativeregulations……like……belongingtoapoliticalorganisationatthepresenttime,orparticipationintheeconomicaffairsofthecommune“{D。C。322-23}。 Therewillthereforeberichandpooreconomiccommunes,andthelevellingouttakesplacethroughthepopulationcrowdingintotherichcommunesandleavingthepoorones。SothatalthoughHerrDühringwantstoeliminatecompetitioninproductsbetweentheindividualcommunesbymeansofnationalorganisationoftrade,hecalmlyallowscompetitionamongtheproducerstocontinue。Thingsareremovedfromthesphereofcompetition,butmenremainsubjecttoit。 Butwearestillveryfarfromclearonthequestionof“publicisticright“{322}。TwopagesfurtheronHerrDühringexplainstous: Thetradecommune“willatfirstcoverthepolitico-socialareawhoseinhabitantsformasinglelegalentityandinthischaracterhaveattheirdisposalthewholeoftheland,thedwellingsandproductiveinstitutions“ {325}。 Soafterallitisnottheindividualcommuneatwhosedisposalthesethingsare,butthewholenation。The“publicright“{322},“righttotheobject“,“publicisticrelationtonature“{342}andsoforthisthereforenotmerely“atleastunclearandopentoquestion“{295}:itisindirectcontradictionwithitself。Itisinfact,atanyrateinsofaraseachindividualeconomiccommuneislikewisealegalentity,“anownershipwhichisatoncebothindividualandsocial“{D。K。G。503},andthislatter“nebuloushybrid“ {504}isonceagain,therefore,onlytobemetwithinHerrDühring’sownworks。 Inanycasetheeconomiccommunehasatitsdisposalinstrumentsoflabourforthepurposeofproduction。Howisthisproductioncarriedon?JudgingbyallHerrDühringhastoldus,preciselyasinthepast,exceptthatthecommunetakestheplaceofthecapitalists。Themostwearetoldisthateveryonewillthenbefreetochoosehisoccupation,andthattherewillbeequalobligationtowork。 Thebasicformofallproductionhithertohasbeenthedivisionoflabour,ontheonehand,withinsocietyasawhole,andontheother,withineachseparateproductiveestablishment。HowdoestheDühring“sociality“{seeD。C。263,277,291}standonthisquestion? Thefirstgreatdivisionoflabourinsocietyistheseparationoftownandcountry。 Thisantagonism,accordingtoHerrDühring,is“inthenatureofthingsinevitable“{232}。But“itisingeneraldoubtfultoregardthegulfbetweenagricultureandindustry……asunbridgeable。Infact,therealreadyexists,toacertainextent,constancyofinterconnectionwithpromisestoincreaseconsiderablyinthefuture“{250}。Already,welearn,twoindustrieshavepenetratedagricultureandruralproduction:“inthefirstplace,distilling,andinthesecond,beet-sugarmanufacturing…… theproductionofspiritsisalreadyofsuchimportancethatitismorelikelytobeunder-estimatedthanover-estimated“{250-51}。And“ifitwerepossible,asaresultofsomeinventions,foralargernumberofindustriestodevelopinsuchawaythattheyshouldbecompelledtolocalisetheirproductioninthecountryandcarryitonindirectassociationwiththeproductionofrawmaterials“{251}——thenthiswouldweakentheantithesisbetweentownandcountryand“providethewidestpossiblebasisforthedevelopmentofcivilisation“。Moreover,“asomewhatsimilarresultmightalsobeattainedinanotherway。Apartfromtechnicalrequirements,socialneedsarecomingmoreandmoretotheforefront,andifthelatterbecomethedominantconsiderationinthegroupingofhumanactivitiesitwillnolongerbepossibletooverlookthoseadvantageswhichensuefromacloseandsystematicconnectionbetweentheoccupationsofthecountrysideandthetechnicaloperationsofworkinguprawmaterials“{252}。 Nowintheeconomiccommuneitispreciselysocialneedswhicharecomingtotheforefront;andsowillitreallyhastentotakeadvantage,tothefullestpossibleextent,oftheabove-mentionedunionofagricultureandindustry?WillHerrDühringnotfailtotellus,athisaccustomedlength,his“moreexactconceptions“{343}ontheattitudeoftheeconomiccommunetothisquestion?Thereaderwhoexpectedhimnottowouldbecruellydisillusioned。Theabove-mentionedmeagre,stalecommonplaces,onceagainnotpassingbeyondtheschnaps-distillingandbeet-sugarmakingsphereofthejurisdictionofPrussianlaw,areallthatHerrDühringhastosayontheantithesisbetweentownandcountryinthepresentandinthefuture。 Letuspassontothedivisionoflabourindetail。HereHerrDühringisalittle“moreexact“。Hespeaksof“apersonwhohastodevotehimselfexclusivelytooneformofoccupation“{D。C。257}。Ifthepointatissueistheintroductionofanewbranchofproduction,theproblemsimplyhingesonwhetheracertainnumberofentities,whoaretodevotethemselvestotheproductionofonesinglearticle,cansomehowbeprovidedwiththeconsumption(!)theyrequire{278}。Inthesocialitariansystemnobranchofproductionwould“requiremanypeople“,andthere,too,therewouldbe“economicspecies“ofmen“distinguishedbytheirwayoflife“ {329}。 Accordingly,withinthesphereofproductioneverythingremainsmuchthesameasbefore。Insocietyuptonow,however,an“erroneousdivisionoflabour“{327}hasobtained,butastowhatthisis,andbywhatitistobereplacedintheeconomiccommune,weareonlytold: “Withregardtothedivisionoflabouritself,wehavealreadysaidabovethatthisquestioncanbeconsideredsettledassoonasaccountistakenofthevariousnaturalconditionsandpersonalcapabilities“{259}。 Inadditiontocapabilities,personallikingsaretakenintoaccount: “Thepleasurefeltinrisingtotypesofactivitywhichinvolveadditionalcapabilitiesandtrainingwoulddependexclusivelyontheinclinationfeltfortheoccupationinquestionandonthejoyproducedintheexerciseofpreciselythisandnootherthing“{D。Ph。283}(exerciseofathing!)。 Andthiswillstimulatecompetitionwithinthesocialitariansystem,sothat“productionitselfwillbecomeinteresting,andthedullpursuitofit,whichseesinitnothingbutameansofearning,willnolongerputitsheavyimprintonconditions“{D。C。265}。 Ineverysocietyinwhichproductionhasdevelopedspontaneously——andourpresentsocietyisofthistype——thesituationisnotthattheproducerscontrolthemeansofproduction,butthatthemeansofproductioncontroltheproducers。Insuchasocietyeachnewleverofproductionisnecessarilytransformedintoanewmeansforthesubjectionoftheproducerstothemeansofproduction。Thisismostofalltrueofthatleverofproductionwhich,priortotheintroductionofmodernindustry,wasbyfarthemostpowerful——thedivisionoflabour。Thefirstgreatdivisionoflabour,theseparationoftownandcountry,condemnedtheruralpopulationtothousandsofyearsofmentaltorpidity,andthepeopleofthetownseachtosubjectiontohisownindividualtrade。Itdestroyedthebasisoftheintellectualdevelopmentoftheformerandthephysicaldevelopmentofthelatter。Whenthepeasantappropriateshisland,andthetownsmanhistrade,thelandappropriatesthepeasantandthetradethetownsmantotheverysameextent。 Inthedivisionoflabour,manisalsodivided。Allotherphysicalandmentalfacultiesaresacrificedtothedevelopmentofonesingleactivity。 Thisstuntingofmangrowsinthesamemeasureasthedivisionoflabour,whichattainsitshighestdevelopmentinmanufacture。Manufacturesplitsupeachtradeintoitsseparatepartialoperations,allotseachofthesetoanindividuallabourerashislifecalling,andthuschainshimforlifetoaparticulardetailfunctionandaparticulartool。“Itconvertsthelabourerintoacrippledmonstrosity,byforcinghisdetaildexterityattheexpenseofaworldofproductivecapabilitiesandinstincts……Theindividualhimselfismadetheautomaticmotorofafractionaloperation“ (Marx)——amotorwhichinmanycasesisperfectedonlybyliterallycripplingthelabourerphysicallyandmentally。Themachineryofmodernindustrydegradesthelabourerfromamachinetothemereappendageofamachine。 “Thelife-longspecialityofhandlingoneandthesametool,nowbecomesthelife-longspecialityofservingoneandthesamemachine。Machineryisputtoawronguse,withtheobjectoftransformingtheworkman,fromhisverychildhood,intoapartofadetail-machine“(Marx)。Andnotonlythelabourersbutalsotheclassesdirectlyorindirectlyexploitingthelabourersaremadesubject,throughthedivisionoflabour,tothetooloftheirfunction:theempty-mindedbourgeoistohisowncapitalandhisowninsanecravingforprofits;thelawyertohisfossilisedlegalconceptions,whichdominatehimasanindependentpower;the“educatedclasses“ingeneraltotheirmanifoldspeciesoflocalnarrow-mindednessandone-sidedness,totheirownphysicalandmentalshort-sightedness,totheirstuntedgrowthduetotheirnarrowspecialisededucationandtheirbeingchainedforlifetothisspecialisedactivity——evenwhenthisspecialisedactivityismerelytodonothing。 Theutopianswerealreadyperfectlyclearintheirmindsastotheeffectsofthedivisionoflabour,thestuntingontheonehandofthelabourer,andontheotherofthelabourfunction,whichisrestrictedtothelifelonguniformmechanicalrepetitionofoneandthesameoperation。 TheabolitionoftheantithesisbetweentownandcountrywasdemandedbyFourier,asbyOwen,asthefirstbasicprerequisitefortheabolitionoftheolddivisionoflabouraltogether。Bothofthemthoughtthatthepopulationshouldbescatteredthroughthecountryingroupsofsixteenhundredtothreethousandpersons;eachgroupwastooccupyagiganticpalace,withahouseholdrunoncommunallines,inthecentreoftheirareaofland。ItistruethatFourieroccasionallyreferstotowns,buttheseweretoconsistinturnofonlyfourorfivesuchpalacessituatedneareachother。Bothwriterswouldhaveeachmemberofsocietyoccupiedinagricultureaswellasinindustry;withFourier,industrycoverschieflyhandicraftsandmanufacture,whileOwenassignsthemainroletomodernindustryandalreadydemandstheintroductionofsteam-powerandmachineryindomesticwork。Butwithinagricultureaswellasindustrybothofthemalsodemandthegreatestpossiblevarietyofoccupationforeachindividual,andinaccordancewiththis,thetrainingoftheyouthfortheutmostpossibleall-roundtechnicalfunctions。Theybothconsiderthatmanshouldgainuniversaldevelopmentthroughuniversalpracticalactivityandthatlabourshouldrecovertheattractivenessofwhichthedivisionoflabourhasdespoiledit,inthefirstplacethroughthisvariationofoccupation,andthroughthecorrespondinglyshortdurationofthe“sitting“——touseFourier’sexpression——devotedtoeachparticularkindofwork。BothFourierandOwenarefarinadvanceofthemodeofthoughtoftheexploitingclassesinheritedbyHerrDühring,accordingtowhichtheantithesisbetweentownandcountryisinevitableinthenatureofthings;thenarrowviewthatanumberof“entities“{D。C。257}mustinanyeventbecondemnedtotheproductionofonesinglearticle,theviewthatdesirestoperpetuatethe“economicspecies“{329}ofmendistinguishedbytheirwayoflife——peoplewhotakepleasureintheperformanceofpreciselythisandnootherthing,whohavethereforesunksolowthattheyrejoiceintheirownsubjectionandone-sidedness。Incomparisonwiththebasicconceptionsevenofthe“idiot“{D。K。G。286}Fourier’smostrecklesslyboldfantasies;incomparisonevenwiththepaltriestideasofthe“crude,feeble,andpaltry“{295,296}Owen——HerrDühring,himselfstillcompletelydominatedbythedivisionoflabour,isnomorethananimpertinentdwarf。 Inmakingitselfthemasterofallthemeansofproductiontousetheminaccordancewithasocialplan,societyputsanendtotheformersubjectionofmentotheirownmeansofproduction。Itgoeswithoutsayingthatsocietycannotfreeitselfunlesseveryindividualisfreed。Theoldmodeofproductionmustthereforeberevolutionisedfromtoptobottom,andinparticulartheformerdivisionoflabourmustdisappear。Itsplacemustbetakenbyanorganisationofproductioninwhich,ontheonehand,noindividualcanthrowontheshouldersofothershisshareinproductivelabour,thisnaturalconditionofhumanexistence;andinwhich,ontheotherhand,productivelabour,insteadofbeingameansofsubjugatingmen,willbecomeameansoftheiremancipation,byofferingeachindividualtheopportunitytodevelopallhisfaculties,physicalandmental,inalldirectionsandexercisethemtothefull——inwhich,therefore,productivelabourwillbecomeapleasureinsteadofbeingaburden。 Todaythisisnolongerafantasy,nolongerapiouswish。Withthepresentdevelopmentoftheproductiveforces,theincreaseinproductionthatwillfollowfromtheveryfactofthesocialisationoftheproductiveforces,coupledwiththeabolitionofthebarriersanddisturbances,andofthewasteofproductsandmeansofproduction,resultingfromthecapitalistmodeofproduction,willsuffice,witheverybodydoinghisshareofwork,toreducethetimerequiredforlabourtoapointwhich,measuredbyourpresentconceptions,willbesmallindeed。 Noristheabolitionoftheolddivisionoflabourademandwhichcouldonlybecarriedthroughtothedetrimentoftheproductivityoflabour。 Onthecontrary。Thankstomodernindustryithasbecomeaconditionofproductionitself。“TheemploymentofmachinerydoesawaywiththenecessityofcrystallisingthedistributionofvariousgroupsofworkmenamongthedifferentkindsofmachinesafterthemannerofManufacture,bytheconstantannexationofaparticularmantoaparticularfunction。Sincethemotionofthewholesystemdoesnotproceedfromtheworkman,butfromthemachinery,achangeofpersonscantakeplaceatanytimewithoutaninterruptionofthework……Lastly,thequicknesswithwhichmachineworkislearntbyyoungpeople,doesawaywiththenecessityofbringingupforexclusiveemploymentbymachinery,aspecialclassofoperatives。”Butwhilethecapitalistmodeofemploymentofmachinerynecessarilyperpetuatestheolddivisionoflabourwithitsfossilisedspecialisation,althoughithasbecomesuperfluousfromatechnicalstandpoint,themachineryitselfrebelsagainstthisanachronism。Thetechnicalbasisofmodernindustryisrevolutionary。“Bymeansofmachinery,chemicalprocessesandothermethods,itiscontinuallycausingchangesnotonlyinthetechnicalbasisofproduction,butalsointhefunctionsofthelabourer,andinthesocialcombinationsofthelabour-process。Atthesametime,ittherebyalsorevolutionisesthedivisionoflabourwithinthesociety,andincessantlylaunchesmassesofcapitalandofworkpeoplefromonebranchofproductiontoanother。 Modernindustry,byitsverynature,thereforenecessitatesvariationoflabour,fluencyoffunction,universalmobilityofthelabourer……Wehaveseenhowthisabsolutecontradiction……ventsitsrageintheincessanthumansacrificesfromamongtheworking-class,inthemostrecklesssquanderingoflabour-power,andinthedevastationcausedbysocialanarchy。Thisisthenegativeside。Butif,ontheonehand,variationofworkatpresentimposesitselfafterthemannerofanoverpoweringnaturallaw,andwiththeblindlydestructiveactionofanaturallawthatmeetswithresistanceatallpoints,modernindustry,ontheotherhand,throughitscatastrophesimposesthenecessityofrecognising,asafundamentallawofproduction,variationofwork,consequentlyfitnessofthelabourerforvariedwork,consequentlythegreatestpossibledevelopmentofhisvariedaptitudes。 Itbecomesaquestionoflifeanddeathforsocietytoadaptthemodeofproductiontothenormalfunctioningofthislaw。Modernindustrymakesitaquestionoflifeanddeathtoreplacethemonstrosityofadestituteworkingpopulationkeptinreserveatthedisposalofcapitalforthechangingneedsofexploitationwiththeabsoluteavailabilityofmanforthechangingrequirementsoflabour;toreplacewhatisvirtuallyamerefragmentoftheindividual,themerecarrierofasocialdetail-function,withthefullydevelopedindividual,towhomthedifferentsocialfunctionsaresomanyalternatingmodesofactivity“(Marx,Capital)。 Modernindustry,whichhastaughtustoconvertthemovementofmolecules,somethingmoreorlessuniversallyfeasible,intothemovementofmassesfortechnicalpurposes,hastherebytoaconsiderableextentfreedproductionfromrestrictionsoflocality。Water-powerwaslocal; steam-powerisfree。Whilewater-powerisnecessarilyrural,steam-powerisbynomeansnecessarilyurban。Itiscapitalistutilisationwhichconcentratesitmainlyinthetownsandchangesfactoryvillagesintofactorytowns。 Butinsodoingitatthesametimeunderminestheconditionsunderwhichitoperates。Thefirstrequirementofthesteam-engine,andamainrequirementofalmostallbranchesofproductioninmodernindustry,isrelativelypurewater。Butthefactorytowntransformsallwaterintostinkingmanure。 Howevermuchthereforeurbanconcentrationisabasicconditionofcapitalistproduction,eachindividualindustrialcapitalistisconstantlystrivingtogetawayfromthelargetownsnecessarilycreatedbythisproduction,andtotransferhisplanttothecountryside。ThisprocesscanbestudiedindetailinthetextileindustrydistrictsofLancashireandYorkshire; moderncapitalistindustryisconstantlybringingnewlargetownsintobeingtherebyconstantflightfromthetownsintothecountry。Thesituationissimilarinthemetal-workingdistrictswhere,inpart,othercausesproducethesameeffects。 Oncemore,onlytheabolitionofthecapitalistcharacterofmodernindustrycanbringusoutofthisnewviciouscircle,canresolvethiscontradictioninmodernindustry,whichisconstantlyreproducingitself。 Onlyasocietywhichmakesitpossibleforitsproductiveforcestodovetailharmoniouslyintoeachotheronthebasisofonesinglevastplancanallowindustrytobedistributedoverthewholecountryinthewaybestadaptedtoitsowndevelopment,andtothemaintenanceanddevelopmentoftheotherelementsofproduction。 Accordingly,abolitionoftheantithesisbetweentownandcountryisnotmerelypossible。Ithasbecomeadirectnecessityofindustrialproductionitself,justasithasbecomeanecessityofagriculturalproductionand,besides,ofpublichealth。Thepresentpoisoningoftheair,waterandlandcanbeputanendtoonlybythefusionoftownandcountry;andonlysuchfusionwillchangethesituationofthemassesnowlanguishinginthetowns,andenabletheirexcrementtobeusedfortheproductionofplantsinsteadoffortheproductionofdisease。 Capitalistindustryhasalreadymadeitselfrelativelyindependentofthelocallimitationsarisingfromthelocationofsourcesoftherawmaterialsitneeds。Thetextileindustryworksup,inthemain,importedrawmaterials。SpanishironoreisworkedupinEnglandandGermanyandSpanishandSouth-Americancopperores,inEngland。Everycoalfieldnowsuppliesfueltoanindustrialareafarbeyonditsownborders,anareawhichiswideningeveryyear。AlongthewholeoftheEuropeancoaststeam-enginesaredrivenbyEnglishandtosomeextentalsobyGermanandBelgiancoal。 Societyliberatedfromtherestrictionsofcapitalistproductioncangomuchfurtherstill。Bygeneratingaraceofproducerswithanall-rounddevelopmentwhounderstandthescientificbasisofindustrialproductionasawhole,andeachofwhomhashadpracticalexperienceinawholeseriesofbranchesofproductionfromstarttofinish,thissocietywillbringintobeinganewproductiveforcewhichwillabundantlycompensateforthelabourrequiredtotransportrawmaterialsandfuelfromgreatdistances。 Theabolitionoftheseparationoftownandcountryisthereforenotutopian,also,insofarasitisconditionedonthemostequaldistributionpossibleofmodernindustryoverthewholecountry。Itistruethatinthehugetownscivilisationhasbequeathedusaheritagewhichitwilltakemuchtimeandtroubletogetridof。Butitmustandwillbegotridof,however,protractedaprocessitmaybe。WhateverdestinymaybeinstorefortheGermanEmpireofthePrussiannation,[119]Bismarckcangotohisgraveproudlyawarethatthedesireofhisheartissuretobefulfilled:thegreattownswillperish。[120] AndnowseehowpuerileisHerrDühring’sideathatsocietycantakepossessionofallmeansofproductionintheaggregatewithoutrevolutionisingfromtoptobottomtheoldmethodofproductionandfirstofallputtinganendtotheolddivisionoflabour;thateverythingwillbeinorderonce“naturalopportunitiesandpersonalcapabilitiesaretakenintoaccount“ {D。C。259}——thatthereforewholemassesofentitieswillremain,asinthepast,subjectedtotheproductionofonesinglearticle;whole“populations“{275} willbeengagedinasinglebranchofproduction,andhumanitycontinuetobedivided,asinthepast,intoanumberofdifferentcrippled“economicspecies“{329},fortherestillare“porters“and“architects“{D。K。G。 500}。Societyistobecomemasterofthemeansofproductionasawhole,inorderthateachindividualmayremaintheslaveofhismeansofproduction,andhaveonlyachoiceastowhichmeansofproductionaretoenslavehim。AndseealsohowHerrDühringconsiderstheseparationoftownandcountryas“inevitableinthenatureofthings“{D。C。232},andcanfindonlyatinypalliativeinschnaps-distillingandbeet-sugarmanufacturing——two,intheirconnectionspecificallyPrussian,branchesofindustry; howhemakesthedistributionofindustryoverthecountrydependentoncertainfutureinventionsandonthenecessityofassociatingindustrydirectlywiththeprocurementofrawmaterials——rawmaterialswhicharealreadyusedataneverincreasingdistancefromtheirplaceoforigin! AndHerrDühringfinallytriestocoveruphisrearbyassuringusthatinthelongrunsocialwantswillcarrythroughtheunionbetweenagricultureandindustryevenagainsteconomicconsiderations,asifthiswouldbesomeeconomicsacrifice! Certainly,tobeabletoseethattherevolutionaryelementswhichwilldoawaywiththeolddivisionoflabour,alongwiththeseparationoftownandcountry,andwillrevolutionisethewholeofproduction;seethattheseelementsarealreadycontainedinembryointheproductionconditionsofmodernlarge-scaleindustryandthattheirdevelopmentishinderedbytheexistingcapitalistmodeofproduction——tobeabletoseethesethings,itisnecessarytohaveasomewhatwiderhorizonthanthesphereofjurisdictionofPrussianlaw,thanthecountrywhereproductionofschnapsandbeet-sugararethekeyindustries,andwherecommercialcrisescanbestudiedonthebookmarket。Tobeabletoseethesethingsitisnecessarytohavesomeknowledgeofreallarge-scaleindustryinitshistoricalgrowthandinitspresentactualform,especiallyintheonecountrywhereithasitshomeandwherealoneithasattaineditsclassicaldevelopment。ThennoonewillthinkofattemptingtovulgarisemodernscientificsocialismandtodegradeitintoHerrDühring’sspecificallyPrussiansocialism。 IV。 DISTRIBUTIONWehavealreadyseenthatDühringianeconomicscomesdowntothefollowingproposition:thecapitalistmodeofproductionisquitegood,andcanremaininexistence,butthecapitalistmodeofdistributionisofevil,andmustdisappear。WenowfindthatHerrDühring’s“socialitarian“systemisnothingmorethanthecarryingthroughofthisprincipleinfantasy。Infact,itturnedoutthatHerrDühringhaspracticallynothingtotakeexceptiontointhemodeofproduction——assuch——ofcapitalistsociety,thathewantstoretaintheolddivisionoflabourinallitsessentials,andthatheconsequentlyhashardlyawordtosayinregardtoproductionwithinhiseconomiccommune。 Productionisindeedasphereinwhichrobustfactsaredealtwith,andinwhichconsequently“rationalfantasy“{D。Ph。46}shouldgivebutlittlescopetothesoaringofitsfreesoul,becausethedangerofmakingadisgracefulblunderistoogreat。Itisquiteotherwisewithdistribution——whichinHerrDühring’sviewhasnoconnectionwhateverwithproductionandisdeterminednotbyproductionbutbyapureactofthewill——distributionisthepredestinedfieldofhis“socialalchemising“{D。K。G。237}。 Totheequalobligationtoproducecorrespondstheequalrighttoconsume,exercisedinanorganisedmannerintheeconomiccommuneandinthetradingcommuneembracingalargenumberofeconomiccommunes。“Labour“ishere“exchangedforotherlabouronthebasisofequalvaluation……Serviceandcounterservicerepresenthererealequalitybetweenquantitiesoflabour“ {D。C。256}。Andthis“equalisationofhumanenergies“applies“whethertheindividualshaveinfactdonemoreorless,orperhapsevennothingatall“{D。Ph。281};forallperformances,insofarastheyinvolvetimeandenergy,canberegardedaslabourdone——thereforeevenplayingbowlsorgoingforawalk{seeD。C。266}。Thisexchange,however,doesnottakeplacebetweenindividualsasthecommunityistheownerofallmeansofproductionandconsequentlyalsoofallproducts;ontheonehandittakesplacebetweeneacheconomiccommuneanditsindividualmembers,andontheotherbetweenthevariouseconomicandtradingcommunesthemselves。 “Theindividualeconomiccommunesinparticularwillreplaceretailtradewithintheirownareasbycompletelyplannedsales“{326}。Wholesaletradewillbeorganisedonthesamelines:“Thesystemofthefreeeconomicsociety……consequentlyremainsavastexchangeinstitution,whoseoperationsarecarriedoutonthebasisprovidedbythepreciousmetals。Itisinsightintotheinevitablenecessityofthisfundamentalqualitywhichdistinguishesourschemefromallthosefoggynotionswhichclingeventothemostrationalformsofcurrentsocialistideas“{324}。 Forthepurposesofthisexchange,theeconomiccommune,asthefirstappropriatorofthesocialproducts,hastodetermine,“foreachtypeofarticles,auniformprice“{277},basedontheaverageproductioncosts。“Thesignificancewhichtheso-calledcostsofproduction……haveforvalueandpricetoday,willbeprovided“(inthesocialitariansystem) “……bytheestimatesofthequantityoflabourtobeemployed。Theseestimates,byvirtueoftheprincipleofequalrightsforeachindividualalsointheeconomicsphere,canbetracedback,inthelastanalysis,toconsiderationofthenumberofpersonsthatparticipatedinthelabour;theywillresultintherelationofpricescorrespondingbothtothenaturalconditionsofproductionandtothesocialrightofrealisation。Theoutputofthepreciousmetalswillcontinue,asnow,todeterminethevalueofmoney…… Itcanbeseenfromthisthatinthechangedconstitutionofsociety,onenotonlydoesnotlosethedeterminingfactorandmeasure,inthefirstplaceofvalues,and,withvalue,oftheexchangerelationsbetweenproducts,butwinsthemgoodandproperforthefirsttime“{326-327}。 Thefamous“absolutevalue“{D。K。G。499}isatlastrealised。 Ontheotherhand,however,thecommunemustalsoputitsindividualmembersinapositiontobuyfromitthearticlesproduced,bypayingtoeach,incompensationforhislabour,acertainsumofmoney,daily,weeklyormonthly,butnecessarilythesameforall。“Fromthesocialitarianstandpointitisconsequentlyamatterofindifferencewhetherwesaythatwagesdisappear,or,thattheymustbecometheexclusiveformofeconomicincome“{D。C。 263}。Equalwagesandequalprices,however,establish“quantitative,ifnotqualitativeequalityofconsumption“{268},andtherebythe“universalprincipleofjustice“{282}isrealisedintheeconomicsphere。 Astohowthelevelofthiswageofthefutureistobedetermined,HerrDühringtellsusonlythatheretoo,asinallothercases,therewillbeanexchangeof“equallabourforequallabour“{D。C。257}。Forsixhoursoflabour,therefore,asumofmoneywillbepaidwhichalsoembodiesinitselfsixhoursoflabour。 Nevertheless,the“universalprincipleofjustice“mustnotinanywaybeconfoundedwiththatcrudelevellingdownwhichmakesthebourgeoissoindignantlyopposeallcommunism,andespeciallythespontaneouscommunismoftheworkers。Itisbynomeanssoinexorableasitwouldliketoappear。 The“equalityinprincipleofeconomicrightsdoesnotexcludethevoluntaryadditiontowhatjusticerequiresofanexpressionofspecialrecognitionandhonour……Societyhonoursitselfinconferringdistinctiononthehighertypesofprofessionalabilitybyamoderateadditionalallocationforconsumption“{267}。 AndHerrDühring,too,honourshimself,whencombiningtheinnocenceofadovewiththesubtlenessofaserpent,[Matthew10:16——Ed。]hedisplayssuchtouchingconcernforthemoderateadditionalconsumptionoftheDühringsofthefuture。 Thiswillfinallydoawaywiththecapitalistmodeofdistribution。 For“supposingundersuchconditionssomeoneactuallyhadasurplusofprivatemeansathisdisposal,hewouldnotbeabletofindanyuseforitascapital。Noindividualandnogroupwouldacquireitfromhimforproduction,exceptbywayofexchangeorpurchase,butneitherwouldeverhaveoccasiontopayhiminterestorprofit“{264-65}。Hence“inheritanceconformingtotheprincipleofequality“{289}wouldbepermissible。Itcannotbedispensedwith,for“acertainformofinheritancewillalwaysbeanecessaryaccompanimentofthefamilyprinciple“。Buteventherightofinheritance“willnotbeabletoleadtoanyamassingofconsiderablewealth,asthebuildingupofproperty……canneveragainaimatthecreationofmeansofproductionandpurelyrentiers’existences“{291}。 Andthisfortunatelycompletestheeconomiccommune。Letusnowhavealookathowitworks。 WeassumethatallofHerrDühring’spreliminaryconditionsarecompletelyrealised;wethereforetakeitforgrantedthattheeconomiccommunepaystoeachofitsmembers,forsixhoursoflabouraday,asumofmoney,saytwelvemarks,inwhichlikewisesixhoursoflabourareembodied。 Weassumefurtherthatpricesexactlycorrespondtovalues,andtherefore,onourassumptions,coveronlythecostsofrawmaterials,thewearandtearofmachinery,theconsumptionofinstrumentsoflabourandthewagespaid。Aneconomiccommuneofahundredworkingmemberswouldthenproduceinadaycommoditiestothevalueoftwelvehundredmarks;andinayearof300working-days,360,000marks。Itpaysthesamesumtoitsmembers,eachofwhomdoesashelikeswithhisshare,whichistwelvemarksadayor3,600marksayear。Attheendofayear,andattheendofahundredyears,thecommuneisnoricherthanitwasatthebeginning。DuringthiswholeperioditwillneveroncebeinapositiontoprovideeventhemoderateadditionalallocationforHerrDühring’sconsumption,unlessitcarestotakeitfromitsstockofmeansofproduction。Accumulationiscompletelyforgotten。Evenworse:asaccumulationisasocialnecessityandtheretentionofmoneyprovidesaconvenientformofaccumulation,theorganisationoftheeconomiccommunedirectlyimpelsitsmemberstoaccumulateprivately,andtherebyleadsittoitsowndestruction。 Howcanthisconflictinthenatureoftheeconomiccommunebeavoided?Itmighttakerefugeinhisbeloved“taxes“{24},thepricesurcharge,andsellitsannualproductionfor480,000insteadof360,000。Butasallothereconomiccommunesareinthesameposition,andwouldthereforeactinthesameway,eachofthem,initsexchangeswiththeothers,wouldhavetopayjustasmuch“taxes“asitpocketsitself,andthe“tribute“ {374}wouldthushavetofallonitsownmembersalone。 Ortheeconomiccommunemightsettlethematterwithoutmoreadobypayingtoeachmember,forsixhoursoflabour,theproductoflessthansixhours,say,offourhours,oflabour;thatistosay,insteadoftwelvemarksonlyeightmarksaday,leavingthepricesofcommodities,however,attheirformerlevel。Inthiscaseitdoesdirectlyandopenlywhatitstrivedtodoinahiddenandindirectwayintheformercase: itformsMarxiansurplus-valuetotheamountof120,000marksannually,bypayingitsmembers,onoutrightcapitalistlines,lessthanthevalueofwhattheyproduce,whileitsellsthemcommodities,whichtheycanonlybuyfromit,attheirfullvalue。Theeconomiccommunecanthereforesecureareservefundonlybyrevealingitselfasan“ennobled“trucksystem*13onthewidestpossiblecommunistbasis。 Sohaveyourchoice:Eithertheeconomiccommuneexchanges“equallabourforequallabour“{257},andinthiscaseitcannotaccumulateafundforthemaintenanceandextensionofproduction,butonlytheindividualmemberscandothis;oritdoesformsuchafund,butinthiscaseitdoesnotexchange“equallabourforequallabour“。 Suchisthecontentofexchangeintheeconomiccommune。Whatofitsform?Theexchangeiseffectedthroughthemediumofmetallicmoney,andHerrDühringisnotalittleproudofthe“world-historicimport“ {D。C。341}ofthisreform。Butinthetradingbetweenthecommuneanditsmembersthemoneyisnotmoneyatall,itdoesnotfunctioninanywayasmoney。Itservesasamerelabourcertificate;touseMarx’sphrase,itis“merelyevidenceoftheparttakenbytheindividualinthecommonlabour,andofhisrighttoacertainportionofthecommonproducedestinedforconsumption“,andincarryingoutthisfunction,itis“nomore’money’thanaticketforthetheatre“。Itcanthereforebereplacedbyanyothertoken,justasWeitlingreplacesitbya“ledger“,inwhichthelabour-hoursworkedareenteredononesideandmeansofsubsistencetakenascompensationontheother。[121]Inaword,inthetradingoftheeconomiccommunewithitsmembersitfunctionsmerelyasOwen’s“labourmoney“,that“phantom“whichHerrDühringlooksdownuponsodisdainfully,butneverthelessishimselfcompelledtointroduceintohiseconomicsofthefuture。Whetherthetokenwhichcertifiesthemeasureoffulfilmentofthe“obligationtoproduce“,andthusoftheearned“righttoconsume“{320}isascrapofpaper,acounteroragoldcoinisabsolutelyofnoconsequenceforthispurpose。 Forotherpurposes,however,itisbynomeansimmaterial,asweshallsee。